From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Prototype git commit viewer Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 19:25:23 +1000 Message-ID: <1115630723.7339.0.camel@gaston> References: <17022.49021.344841.79940@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20050509071341.GA3599@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Mackerras , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 09 11:19:44 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DV4Pp-00023f-Q0 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2005 11:19:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261154AbVEIJZj (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 05:25:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261174AbVEIJZj (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 05:25:39 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:21640 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261154AbVEIJZd (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 05:25:33 -0400 Received: from gaston (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j499JCgJ014843; Mon, 9 May 2005 04:19:13 -0500 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20050509071341.GA3599@pasky.ji.cz> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > > What are its advantages to git-viz? I haven't looked at git-viz in details, but from the screen-shot, I can say I prefer paulus one :) But heh, since when should we limit ourselves to a single tool to do a given job ? :)