From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: git guidance Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:36:25 -0500 Message-ID: <11272.1197056185@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <20071129105220.v40i22q4gw4cgoso@intranet.digizenstudio.com> <200712071353.11654.a1426z@gawab.com> <200712072204.48410.a1426z@gawab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1197056185_3013P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jakub Narebski , Andreas Ericsson , Johannes Schindelin , Phillip Susi , Linus Torvalds , Jing Xue , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org To: Al Boldi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 07 20:36:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0j0K-0006OI-Eb for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:36:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756910AbXLGTgi (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:36:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754416AbXLGTgh (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:36:37 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:51500 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756874AbXLGTgg (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:36:36 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (turing-police.cc.vt.edu [127.0.0.1]) by turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.14.2.Alpha0/8.14.2.Alpha0) with ESMTP id lB7JaPHs011274; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:36:25 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:04:48 +0300." <200712072204.48410.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --==_Exmh_1197056185_3013P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:04:48 +0300, Al Boldi said: > Because WORKFLOW C is transparent, it won't affect other workflows. So you > could still use your normal WORKFLOW B in addition to WORKFLOW C, gaining an > additional level of version control detail at no extra cost other than the > git-engine scratch repository overhead. > > BTW, is git efficient enough to handle WORKFLOW C? Imagine the number of commits a 'make clean; make' will do in a kernel tree, as it commits all those .o files... :) --==_Exmh_1197056185_3013P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHWaC5cC3lWbTT17ARAqJ5AKCatWQmDqbqcBGr/xUrB5a4nlNhsACg277z 4cy3yUcj5tOMBQgmvY7hQQo= =uvAi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1197056185_3013P--