From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
To: cel@citi.umich.edu
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: slow "stg push" on NFS
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:24:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1127201053.7019.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <432F0AFA.3050401@citi.umich.edu>
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 15:01 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> thanks to the several recent patches that add fast-forward support, CPU
> utilization seems to no longer be a problem in general.
That's a good improvement but this doesn't work when the base of the
stack is changed.
> what appears to
> be happening is that each push operation deletes and recreates
> everything in the working directory.
The push operation only does a 'git-read-tree -u -m' which updates the
filesystem. I haven't looked at the git-read-tree code but I suspect it
only updates the files modified as a result of the merge operation. As
Blaisorblade reported, if there are big changes between the new HEAD and
the old bottom of the patch, like file removals and additions, it will
indeed take more time since git-read-tree cannot deal with them and
gitmergeonefile.py will be invoked for each file.
> for shared file systems, creating and deleting files will always be
> synchronous. anything we can do to eliminate the need for deleting and
> recreating files that are not changed by a commit would be great.
I did some profiling with pushing 15 patches with 'git-read-tree
-m' (without -u for updating the working directory) over NFS and only
updating the working files after pushing all the patches. It didn't make
much difference and decided that it is not worth fully implementing it.
That's mainly because my patches were relatively small (few files
changed) and the base of the stack was already checked out, hence just
the patch files were being updated in the working directory.
> (i've also noticed that an "stg pop / stg push" sequence causes 'make'
> to rebuild everything -- possibly due to the same reason?)
The same as 'git checkout branch'. I haven't checked whether the
modification time is preserved.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-20 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-19 19:01 slow "stg push" on NFS Chuck Lever
2005-09-20 7:24 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2005-09-20 17:56 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1127201053.7019.13.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=cel@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).