From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] cogito: Don't ever assume object type in cg-object-id
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:37:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1127403479.14856.13.camel@dv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050922094643.GC21019@pasky.or.cz>
Hi, Petr!
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 11:46 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> $ git-fsck-objects
> error: b3e9704ecdf48869f635f0aa99ddfb513f885aff: object not found
>
> and some dangling stuff, that's all I get. This seems to be caused by
> the mere existence of that (empty) file, so I just removed it from the
> objects database and all is fine now.
Maybe kernel.org site is not in sync yet, but anyway, here's what I
found.
I ran this script:
[proski@dv cogito]$ for i in .git/refs/tags/*; do git-tar-tree `cat $i` >/dev/null || echo $i; done
fatal: not a reference to a tag, commit or tree object: 463d05c7c4fe7f24da29749f4c7f25893fc20b8c
.git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.1
fatal: not a reference to a tag, commit or tree object: 2c70421be7d88fbee49986d7a5584d1f010a25de
.git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.2
fatal: not a reference to a tag, commit or tree object: d14925c87cdb6ca6345bcb3c8e34a2d659c79451
.git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.3
If I delete the bad tags and prune the tree, git-fsck-objects has
nothing to complain about:
[proski@dv cogito]$ rm .git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.1
[proski@dv cogito]$ rm .git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.2
[proski@dv cogito]$ rm .git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.3
[proski@dv cogito]$ git-prune origin `cat .git/refs/tags/*`
[proski@dv cogito]$ git-fsck-objects
[proski@dv cogito]$
That's probably what you should do on the master tree if you haven't
done it.
I can run "git-prune origin", but then cg-fetch would refetch objects
for more tags:
Missing object of tag cogito-0.12... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.12.1... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.13... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.14... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.14.1... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.14.2... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.15... retrieved
Missing object of tag git-pasky-0.1... retrieved
Missing object of tag git-pasky-0.2... retrieved
Missing object of tag git-pasky-0.3... retrieved
How come that cogito-0.12 - cogito-0.15 are not on the origin tree, but
older cogito tags are?
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-22 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-20 2:25 [PATCH 6/8] cogito: Don't ever assume object type in cg-object-id Pavel Roskin
2005-09-21 10:00 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-22 3:27 ` Pavel Roskin
2005-09-22 9:46 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-22 9:52 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-22 15:37 ` Pavel Roskin [this message]
2005-09-22 15:50 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-22 16:55 ` Pavel Roskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1127403479.14856.13.camel@dv \
--to=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).