From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] [RFC] "clone --naked"? Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:06:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1137402365.3034.5.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <43CB57A0.29999.F89D30F@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de> <7vfynoy5p5.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ulrich Windl , git@vger.kernel.org, users@kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 16 10:06:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyQJs-0007rG-5a for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:06:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932251AbWAPJGN (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:06:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751116AbWAPJGM (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:06:12 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:38371 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751107AbWAPJGL (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:06:11 -0500 Received: from [2002:d55d:ead:110:20e:35ff:fea5:7eb2] (helo=[IPv6:2002:d55d:ead:110:20e:35ff:fea5:7eb2]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EyQJS-0002L4-RB; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:06:07 +0000 To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vfynoy5p5.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 23:47 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Ulrich Windl" writes: > > > On 14 Jan 2006 at 15:39, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > [...] > >> BTW, I have been meaning to make this easier, by introducing a > >> new option to "git clone", like this: > > ... > > You must be over 21 to use --naked, however ;-) > > Maybe you find a better word. > > Linus seems to use word "bare" sometimes. Checking the git-core > documentation, repository-layout documentation first used the > word naked on Sep 1 2005, while there is no mention of "bare" > repository anywhere. Maybe "bare" is preferred? > > I hope you do not mind my sending this message out to git list > to take a quick poll. While I don't give a rats bottom about the "21"-ness of naked, "naked" is more likely to trigger spam traps than "bare" though... just a side consideration but unfortunately needed nowadays ;(