From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: [PATCH] Invoke git-repo-config directly. Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:27:37 -0600 Message-ID: <1142537257.17536.137.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> References: <20060314211022.GA12498@localhost.localdomain> <20060314224027.GB14733@localhost.localdomain> <7vek13ieap.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vlkvbffhz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060316075324.GA19650@pfit.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <7vmzfq8zmr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 16 20:28:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJy8d-00087h-6f for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:27:59 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752437AbWCPT14 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:27:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752451AbWCPT14 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:27:56 -0500 Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net ([192.88.158.103]:19593 "EHLO az33egw02.freescale.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752437AbWCPT1z (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:27:55 -0500 Received: from az33smr02.freescale.net (az33smr02.freescale.net [10.64.34.200]) by az33egw02.freescale.net (8.12.11/az33egw02) with ESMTP id k2GJfopM005695 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:41:50 -0700 (MST) Received: from [10.82.19.2] (cashmere.am.freescale.net [10.82.19.2]) by az33smr02.freescale.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k2GJc6qF019964 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:38:06 -0600 (CST) To: Git List In-Reply-To: <7vmzfq8zmr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2.ydl.1) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 04:14, Junio C Hamano wrote: > And the second issue is the last point in the "implications" > list above. You are right, and I stand corrected. Our scripts > should consistently use dash form. > > One thing that bothers me is that we need to keep encouraging > users to use dashless form from the command line, while we > update our scripts to use dash form. What a contradicting and > confusing situation X-<. I think it has a philosophical rationale, though. While we want to proved an abstraction layer to the user through the "git" wrapper, we still want to be precise internally within the scripts themselves. Or so. jdl