From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: New release? Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:58:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1149616724.23938.85.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> References: <7vodx6zus2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <1149610100.23938.75.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> <7v3beitdct.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git List , Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 06 20:03:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnftT-00009r-HQ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 20:03:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750714AbWFFSDE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:03:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750738AbWFFSDE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:03:04 -0400 Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net ([192.88.158.103]:10161 "EHLO az33egw02.freescale.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750714AbWFFSDB (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:03:01 -0400 Received: from az33smr02.freescale.net (az33smr02.freescale.net [10.64.34.200]) by az33egw02.freescale.net (8.12.11/az33egw02) with ESMTP id k56IJHUt028650; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:19:17 -0700 (MST) Received: from [10.82.19.2] (cashmere.am.freescale.net [10.82.19.2]) by az33smr02.freescale.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k56I2Xoi016854; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:02:34 -0500 (CDT) To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7v3beitdct.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2.ydl.1) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 12:15, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think the virtual hosting of git-daemon is very important, and > I do not want to have a half-baked one hurriedly cobbled > together for 1.4.0 on the server side. Agreed. > I do agree it is a good idea to have the client-side support in > 1.4.0; that would work well with the current git-daemon. Since > the extension is backward compatible, we can tell the users to > use 1.4.0 or later clients when the daemon side is done. That > is much nicer than telling them to use what's on "master" that > is later than such-and-such commit. Exactly. > > Any chance for that? If you'd like, I work on resubmitting > > just those bits with the connect function refactoring > > that you outlined. > > I appreciate the offer very much. No problem. > Although I said port is > something the server side can usually tell, I would throw in > port there as well. Can do. > Any reason to spell HOST in all uppercase by the way? I would never suggest that it came to me from gittus in an IRC day-dream...? :-) Consider it all lowercaseified instead. jdl