From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Roskin Subject: Re: Problem upgrading to 1.4.0 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:56:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1150170985.4297.104.camel@dv> References: <93c3eada0606101707t5eb35a4du3ebd0fd17737943f@mail.gmail.com> <7v1wtwh246.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <1150165982.4297.88.camel@dv> <20060612224818.383b13ee.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <1150167759.4297.95.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sean , git@vger.kernel.org, geoffrey.russell@gmail.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 13 05:56:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fq017-0008Bq-6w for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:56:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932850AbWFMD4e (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:56:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932853AbWFMD4e (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:56:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:64908 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932850AbWFMD4d (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:56:33 -0400 Received: from proski by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Fq013-0002TP-3r for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:56:33 -0400 Received: from proski by dv.roinet.com with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fq00v-00043E-DM; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:56:25 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.2.1 (2.7.2.1-4) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 20:28 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > > > You can get a list of the remote branches whenever you want: > > > > > > $ git ls-remote -h > > > > I heard of that command. But git-clone only uses it for local and rsync > > protocols. > > The native format doesn't _need_ to use "git ls-remote", because the > native format does it on its own. OK. I actually suspected that git-ls-remote was limited to some protocols. I'm glad to be wrong about it. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin