From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Roskin Subject: Re: git on HP-UX Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:38:43 -0400 Message-ID: <1152344323.26627.13.camel@dv> References: <200607060950.34558.michal.rokos@nextsoft.cz> <1152197629.7720.10.camel@dv> <7vfyhe465i.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 08 09:38:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fz7Ot-0004tn-PR for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:38:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751262AbWGHHit (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 03:38:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751263AbWGHHit (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 03:38:49 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:7593 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751262AbWGHHis (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 03:38:48 -0400 Received: from proski by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Fz7Op-0000UF-TT for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:38:48 -0400 Received: from proski by dv.roinet.com with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fz7Ol-0006xC-Dl; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:38:43 -0400 To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vfyhe465i.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.3 (2.7.3-7) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 17:20 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Pavel Roskin writes: > > I hope the Autoconf based configure is on its way to git, but I don't > > see in in the "pu" branch yet. I'm not very keen about reinventing > > Autoconf and hacking a hand-made configure script. > > OK, you half-convinced me. The other half came from a recent > series of patches to try using 'which' to detect executables, > which is another common mistake handcrafted configure script > makes, which autoconf people have solved for us long time ago. I really appreciate it. I hope all the Autoconf patches in the queue will land in "pu" shortly, and then I'm going to have a closer look at it. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin