From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: Approxidate licensing Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:57:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1160553423.7920.60.camel@pmac.infradead.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 11 09:57:53 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXYxp-0002wC-3q for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:57:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161013AbWJKH5N (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:57:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161011AbWJKH5N (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:57:13 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:5550 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161013AbWJKH5M (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:57:12 -0400 Received: from pmac.infradead.org ([81.187.2.168]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GXYxc-0001L8-TM; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:57:05 +0100 To: Daniel Barkalow In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-7.fc6.dwmw2.2) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 13:39 -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > Would the three of you agree to license date.c under the LGPL or BSD? It > looks like you're the only authors of non-trivial changes [1]. And it seems > reasonable to want the date parsing thing under non-GPL terms outside of > git. Yeah, LGPL and BSD are both fine by me -- although I don't actually recognise much of my own code in there. Btw, why isn't the meaning of 'tea-time' properly modified according to the locale? -- dwmw2