From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Licquia Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:46:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1161478005.9241.210.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <45357CC3.4040507@utoronto.ca> <4536EC93.9050305@utoronto.ca> <87lkncev90.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <453792A8.1010700@utoronto.ca> <878xjc2qeb.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <453803E6.2060309@utoronto.ca> <87ods727pn.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <45382120.9060702@utoronto.ca> <87irie1wvv.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <20061021130111.GL75501@over-yonder.net> <87ac3p1jn7.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <1161472030.9241.174.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061021192539.4a00cc3e.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Sun Oct 22 02:47:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Received: from esperanza.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.173]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbRUY-00058P-99 for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 02:47:06 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=esperanza.ubuntu.com) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GbRUO-0002g6-NL; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:46:56 +0100 Received: from jeffindy.licquia.org ([216.37.46.185]) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GbRUH-0002fU-IP for bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:46:49 +0100 Received: from server1.internal.licquia.org (unknown [192.168.50.3]) by jeffindy.licquia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB6A6FD88; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:46:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.52.6]) by server1.internal.licquia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053EE980DA; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:46:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DEF7A4E4025; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:46:45 -0400 (EDT) To: Sean In-Reply-To: <20061021192539.4a00cc3e.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 X-BeenThere: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar-ng discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Archived-At: On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 19:25 -0400, Sean wrote: > Now the opinion of the bzr people is that it doesn't matter and that for > all important cases it works well enough. If all the people who don't like > the look of sha1's self select bzr, so be it, but that doesn't change the > fundamental argument. Which opinion is this? The opinion that old-style local revnos aren't a big deal, or that new-style dotted revnos aren't a big deal? I suspect you're conflating the two, and interpreting certainty for the former as certainty for the latter. Though I don't mind being corrected.