From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alon Ziv Subject: MinGW port: some questions Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 21:52:00 +0300 Message-ID: <1179341520.31213.38.camel@bruno.nolaviz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 16 20:52:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HoObm-00065G-Jv for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 20:52:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756943AbXEPSwR (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 14:52:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757153AbXEPSwR (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 14:52:17 -0400 Received: from mxout4.netvision.net.il ([194.90.9.27]:64256 "EHLO mxout4.netvision.net.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756986AbXEPSwQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 14:52:16 -0400 Received: from mail.nolaviz.org ([194.90.198.244]) by mxout4.netvision.net.il (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JI500613DR29NE0@mxout4.netvision.net.il> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 21:52:14 +0300 (IDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nolaviz.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381BC2004790 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 21:52:14 +0300 (IDT) Received: from mail.nolaviz.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gardener.nolaviz.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15853-01 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 21:52:01 +0300 (IDT) Received: from [192.168.0.17] (bruno.nolaviz.org [192.168.0.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nolaviz.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D902004789 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 21:52:01 +0300 (IDT) X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at nolaviz.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, I am looking at the MinGW port, and I see some rather strange changes included in the port; "strange" in the sense that they do not appear to have anything to do with MinGW. I am referring, for example, to the changes from commit dc380d6, which were reverted in Git mainline (actually in "next", they never reached Git's "master"). Or to the changes from 4493e36, which had the same fate. Are these intentional? Or are they the result of some strange mismerge? -az