From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, peff@peff.net,
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] test-tool: add pack-deltas helper
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:51:52 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <118698a1-33f8-36b5-c7c6-ed44b9e30d5d@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAtZuU6Qqfag6OHj@pks.im>
Hi Patrick,
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:34:01AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:40:02PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/t/helper/test-pack-deltas.c b/t/helper/test-pack-deltas.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 00000000000..db7d1c3cd1f
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/t/helper/test-pack-deltas.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> > > [snip]
> > > > +int cmd__pack_deltas(int argc, const char **argv)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int N;
> > > > + struct hashfile *f;
> > > > + struct strbuf line = STRBUF_INIT;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (argc != 2) {
> > > > + usage(usage_str);
> > > > + return -1;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + N = atoi(argv[1]);
> > >
> > > Is there a reason why we don't use `parse_options()` here? It might make
> > > this tool easier to use and extend going forward, and we wouldn't have
> > > to care about invalid arguments. Right now, we silently accept a
> > > non-integer argument and do the wrong thing.
> >
> > I think that `parse_options()` would be overkill here because:
> >
> > - This is a _mandatory_ argument, not an optional one.
> >
> > - The required data type is `uint32_t`, and `parse_options()` has no
> > support for that.
>
> Support for that has been merged just this week via 2bc5414c411 (Merge
> branch 'ps/parse-options-integers', 2025-04-24).
That's too new for me to be useful, as I have to work on top of v2.49.0
(see https://github.com/microsoft/git/pull/745).
> > But you do have a good point in that we may want to validate the data type
> > (even if technically, this is not a user-facing program, it's a test
> > helper that is used under tight control by Git's own test suite).
> >
> > Consequently, I would suggest this fixup instead:
>
> But in any case, I'd be equally fine with your suggestion.
Thanks!
Johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 17:40 [PATCH 0/3] Fix REF_DELTA chain bug in 'git index-pack' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-23 17:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] test-tool: add pack-deltas helper Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-23 19:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-23 19:32 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-24 19:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-24 20:06 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-24 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25 4:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 9:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2025-04-25 9:45 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 9:51 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2025-04-25 16:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-28 15:22 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-28 16:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-28 18:59 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-28 20:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-23 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] t5309: create failing test for 'git index-pack' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-23 19:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-23 17:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] index-pack: allow revisiting REF_DELTA chains Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-24 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25 3:49 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix REF_DELTA chain bug in 'git index-pack' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] test-tool: add pack-deltas helper Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] t5309: create failing test for 'git index-pack' Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-04-28 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] index-pack: allow revisiting REF_DELTA chains Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2025-05-07 2:08 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-07 13:47 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-04-28 22:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix REF_DELTA chain bug in 'git index-pack' Junio C Hamano
2025-04-29 5:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=118698a1-33f8-36b5-c7c6-ed44b9e30d5d@gmx.de \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).