From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Morten Welinder Subject: Re: git pull issues... Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:43:26 -0400 Message-ID: <118833cc050425164311f0bbbc@mail.gmail.com> References: <118833cc050423142573729ce2@mail.gmail.com> <20050423220049.GC13222@pasky.ji.cz> <118833cc05042514076221624d@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Morten Welinder Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 26 01:38:44 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQD9l-00037L-Hx for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:38:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261280AbVDYXn2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:43:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261282AbVDYXn2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:43:28 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.200]:26065 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261280AbVDYXn0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:43:26 -0400 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1018431rng for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jcXH+dK5jQjDBm6R7bUR1WKyx6MVJy+S3Rr4pIadHajn6y8SB5hZ98YoqznqFjTj8p/1YIgNHtF8F7nCMldkDgOBZI6lRAcIFy05Lf+bcQqh8L8DD3z5YmsngrvOtff5qp8+lNW7rjq2uReSlQ2QzGnoRTK7YtIeOADfWWAqs38= Received: by 10.38.10.66 with SMTP id 66mr7041043rnj; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.77 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT) To: Dan Holmsand In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org The two approaches are very much alike -- there are only so many ways to skin a cat, after all. I actually first considered the -K approach, but then realized that only very new rsyncs support that. My version works with rsync 2.6.2 (and maybe earlier). It could be made to go further back by not using -from0 which isn't really needed here. But I like your check-for-HEAD detail. Morten