From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kristian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8gsberg?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtin-clone: Implement git clone as a builtin command. Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:38:06 -0500 Message-ID: <1197416286.7552.4.camel@hinata.boston.redhat.com> References: <20071211195712.GA3865@bitplanet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Dec 12 00:38:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J2Egg-0002B7-Ey for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:38:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753398AbXLKXiP convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:38:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752713AbXLKXiP (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:38:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42679 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753168AbXLKXiO (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:38:14 -0500 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lBBNcCDB000537; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:38:12 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lBBNcCos016049; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:38:12 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (dhcp83-9.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.9]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lBBNcBXx029192; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:38:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.11.90 (2.11.90-4.fc8) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:59 -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Kristian H=C3=B8gsberg wrote: >=20 > > Ok, don't flame me, I know this isn't appropriate at the moment wit= h > > stabilization for 1.5.4 going on, but I just wanted to post a heads= up > > on this work to avoid duplicate effort. It's one big patch at this= point > > and I haven't even run the test suite yet, but that will change. >=20 > Is that why you misspelled Junio's email address? :)=20 Hehe, yeah, do not mess with maintainers in release mode :) > Also as a heads-up, I've got a builtin-checkout that I've got passing= all=20 > the tests (plus a few to test stuff I originally hadn't implemented).= This=20 > mostly involved correcting the "interesting" states that unpack_trees= ()=20 > can leave the index in memory when it returns and figuring out how th= e=20 > merge code works. I can send it off for review and testing to people = who=20 > are interested and don't have other things they should be doing inste= ad. Thanks, that's useful, I was already considering what to do next. I wouldn't mind having a look, but maybe it's better to not discuss new features on the list at this point. I appreciate the heads up though. cheers, Kristian