* [PATCH] clone: support cloning full bundles
@ 2007-12-12 10:48 Santi Béjar
2007-12-12 14:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Santi Béjar @ 2007-12-12 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git Mailing List; +Cc: Santi Béjar
It still fails for incremental bundles.
Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com>
---
Hi *,
Does anyone know how to create a repository from an incremental bundle?
Also, when a repo/bundle does not have a HEAD, clone does not setup the
remote configs, is this the desired behavior?
I know that Kristian is working in the C conversion, I'll rebase this
patch on top if that is prefered. Or maybe it will not be necessary at all,
as "git fetch" supports bundles.
Santi
git-clone.sh | 17 +++++++++++++----
t/t5701-clone-local.sh | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-clone.sh b/git-clone.sh
index ecf9d89..a4a2124 100755
--- a/git-clone.sh
+++ b/git-clone.sh
@@ -206,11 +206,14 @@ fi
if base=$(get_repo_base "$repo"); then
repo="$base"
local=yes
+elif [ -f "$repo" ] ; then
+ case "$repo" in /*);; *) repo="$PWD/$repo" ; esac
fi
dir="$2"
# Try using "humanish" part of source repo if user didn't specify one
[ -z "$dir" ] && dir=$(echo "$repo" | sed -e 's|/$||' -e 's|:*/*\.git$||' -e 's|.*[/:]||g')
+[ -f "$dir" ] && dir=$(expr "$repo" : '.*/\([^/]*\)\.[^/]*')
[ -e "$dir" ] && die "destination directory '$dir' already exists."
[ yes = "$bare" ] && unset GIT_WORK_TREE
[ -n "$GIT_WORK_TREE" ] && [ -e "$GIT_WORK_TREE" ] &&
@@ -359,11 +362,17 @@ yes)
fi
;;
*)
- case "$upload_pack" in
- '') git-fetch-pack --all -k $quiet $depth $no_progress "$repo";;
- *) git-fetch-pack --all -k $quiet "$upload_pack" $depth $no_progress "$repo" ;;
- esac >"$GIT_DIR/CLONE_HEAD" ||
+ if [ -f "$repo" ] ; then
+ git bundle unbundle "$repo" > "$GIT_DIR/CLONE_HEAD" ||
+ die "unbundle from '$repo' failed."
+ else
+ case "$upload_pack" in
+ '') git-fetch-pack --all -k $quiet $depth $no_progress "$repo";;
+ *) git-fetch-pack --all -k \
+ $quiet "$upload_pack" $depth $no_progress "$repo" ;;
+ esac >"$GIT_DIR/CLONE_HEAD" ||
die "fetch-pack from '$repo' failed."
+ fi
;;
esac
;;
diff --git a/t/t5701-clone-local.sh b/t/t5701-clone-local.sh
index 822ac8c..a7e5a31 100755
--- a/t/t5701-clone-local.sh
+++ b/t/t5701-clone-local.sh
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ test_expect_success 'preparing origin repository' '
: >file && git add . && git commit -m1 &&
git clone --bare . a.git &&
git clone --bare . x &&
+ git bundle create b1.bundle --all HEAD &&
test "$(GIT_CONFIG=a.git/config git config --bool core.bare)" = true &&
test "$(GIT_CONFIG=x/config git config --bool core.bare)" = true
'
@@ -63,4 +64,14 @@ test_expect_success 'Even without -l, local will make a hardlink' '
test 0 = $copied
'
+test_expect_success 'bundle clone with suffix' '
+ cd "$D" &&
+ git clone b1.bundle
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'bundle clone' '
+ cd "$D" &&
+ git clone b1.bundle bdl1
+'
+
test_done
--
1.5.3.7.2094.gff6c
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] clone: support cloning full bundles
2007-12-12 10:48 [PATCH] clone: support cloning full bundles Santi Béjar
@ 2007-12-12 14:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-12 15:21 ` Santi Béjar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-12-12 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Santi Béjar; +Cc: Git Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 265 bytes --]
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Santi Béjar wrote:
> It still fails for incremental bundles.
Of course it does. The whole point of incremental bundles is that they do
_not_ contain all objects, but rely on some objects being present on the
"fetch" side.
Hth,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] clone: support cloning full bundles
2007-12-12 14:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-12-12 15:21 ` Santi Béjar
2007-12-12 18:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Santi Béjar @ 2007-12-12 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: Git Mailing List
On Dec 12, 2007 3:50 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Santi Béjar wrote:
>
> > It still fails for incremental bundles.
>
> Of course it does. The whole point of incremental bundles is that they do
> _not_ contain all objects, but rely on some objects being present on the
> "fetch" side.
I know this. But then there is no bundle equivalent of the shallow
clones, as with:
git clone --depth <depth> <repo>
Santi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] clone: support cloning full bundles
2007-12-12 15:21 ` Santi Béjar
@ 2007-12-12 18:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-13 9:37 ` Santi Béjar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2007-12-12 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Santi Béjar; +Cc: Git Mailing List
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Santi B?jar wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 3:50 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Santi B?jar wrote:
> >
> > > It still fails for incremental bundles.
> >
> > Of course it does. The whole point of incremental bundles is that
> > they do _not_ contain all objects, but rely on some objects being
> > present on the "fetch" side.
>
> I know this. But then there is no bundle equivalent of the shallow
> clones, as with:
>
> git clone --depth <depth> <repo>
Ah, thanks. Completely forgot about this.
Ciao,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] clone: support cloning full bundles
2007-12-12 18:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2007-12-13 9:37 ` Santi Béjar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Santi Béjar @ 2007-12-13 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: Git Mailing List
On Dec 12, 2007 7:46 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Santi B?jar wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 2007 3:50 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Santi B?jar wrote:
> > >
> > > > It still fails for incremental bundles.
> > >
> > > Of course it does. The whole point of incremental bundles is that
> > > they do _not_ contain all objects, but rely on some objects being
> > > present on the "fetch" side.
> >
> > I know this. But then there is no bundle equivalent of the shallow
> > clones, as with:
> >
> > git clone --depth <depth> <repo>
>
> Ah, thanks. Completely forgot about this.
But you were right, I confused incremental and shadow. So the next step would be
git bundle create --depth <depth> ...
I'll see what I can do.
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-13 9:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-12 10:48 [PATCH] clone: support cloning full bundles Santi Béjar
2007-12-12 14:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-12 15:21 ` Santi Béjar
2007-12-12 18:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-13 9:37 ` Santi Béjar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).