git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 00/10] Build in merge
@ 2008-06-11 20:50 Miklos Vajna
  2008-06-11 20:50 ` [PATCH 01/10] Move split_cmdline() to alias.c Miklos Vajna
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Vajna @ 2008-06-11 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git

Hi,

It was almost a week ago I posted the previous series here and there
were numerous improvements since then.

A short changelog:

 - introducing filter_independent() in commit.c

 - avoiding commit_list_append()

 - using parseopt's skip_prefix()

 - avoiding unnecessary strbuf_addf() in builtin-fmt-merge-msg.c

As always, comments are welcome. I hope I addressed all the issues which
were pointed out in the previous thread. If this is not the case, please
correct me.

Thanks.

Miklos Vajna (10):
  Move split_cmdline() to alias.c
  Move commit_list_count() to commit.c
  Move parse-options's skip_prefix() to git-compat-util.h
  Add new test to ensure git-merge handles pull.twohead and
    pull.octopus
  parseopt: add a new PARSE_OPT_ARGV0_IS_AN_OPTION option
  Move read_cache_unmerged() to read-cache.c
  git-fmt-merge-msg: make it usable from other builtins
  Introduce get_octopus_merge_bases() in commit.c
  Introduce filter_independent() in commit.c
  Build in merge

 Makefile                                      |    2 +-
 alias.c                                       |   54 ++
 builtin-fmt-merge-msg.c                       |  157 ++--
 builtin-merge-recursive.c                     |    8 -
 builtin-merge.c                               | 1128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 builtin-read-tree.c                           |   24 -
 builtin-remote.c                              |   39 +-
 builtin.h                                     |    4 +
 cache.h                                       |    3 +
 commit.c                                      |   56 ++
 commit.h                                      |    3 +
 git-merge.sh => contrib/examples/git-merge.sh |    0 
 git-compat-util.h                             |    6 +
 git.c                                         |   54 +--
 parse-options.c                               |   11 +-
 parse-options.h                               |    1 +
 read-cache.c                                  |   31 +
 t/t7601-merge-pull-config.sh                  |   72 ++
 18 files changed, 1482 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 builtin-merge.c
 rename git-merge.sh => contrib/examples/git-merge.sh (100%)
 create mode 100755 t/t7601-merge-pull-config.sh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 09/10] Introduce get_octopus_merge_bases() in commit.c
@ 2008-06-06  5:53 Junio C Hamano
  2008-06-07 21:38 ` [PATCH] " Miklos Vajna
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2008-06-06  5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Miklos Vajna; +Cc: git

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> When you want to merge A, B and C, because internally we always do
> pairwise, you would first compute:
>
> 	T(A,B) == merge_3way(mb(A,B), A, B)
>
> and then you would want to pick some merge base to merge that result with
> C:
>
> 	T(A,B,C) == merge_3way(???, T(A,B), C)
>
> I do not think using mb(mb(A,B),C) as ??? is necessary nor optimal.
>
>           o---o---A
>          /         .
>     ----1---2---B...T(A,B)
>              \       .
>               o---C...T(A,B,C)
>
> "1" above is mb(A,B) (i.e. the merge base between A and B) that you would
> use when you merge A and B to compute an internal merge result T(A,B).
> And "1" also is mb(mb(A,B),C).
>
> But if you are doing 3-way merge to arrive at T(A,B,C) by merging T(A,B)
> and C, don't you want to be using "2" as the merge base, not "1"?
>
> The big comment on $MRC at the end of git-merge-octopus is about this
> issue.  In earlier implementation, we used to use "1" to create T(A,B) and
> then also used it to update the variable $MRC, which is used to compute
> the merge base to use when the tentative tree T(A,B) is merged with the
> other remote in the next round.  It was a mistake.
>
> Ideally we should pick a better base between mb(A,C) and mb(B,C) (and if
> we used mb(B,C) that's "2" and is a much better base than "1" when merging
> T(A,B) and C).  Using mb(mb(A,B),C) means we are guaranteed to pick the
> worst base for that last merge.

Something like this might be enough to get us started.  Instead of finding
out the merge bases between two commits, "one" and "two", this would find
merge base between "one" and a commit that would be a merge across all the
"two"s.  To apply it to the above example, you would give "C" as "one",
and "A" and "B" as "twos" to it, to compute "2".

 commit.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
index 94d5b3d..816eed1 100644
--- a/commit.c
+++ b/commit.c
@@ -531,26 +531,33 @@ static struct commit *interesting(struct commit_list *list)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static struct commit_list *merge_bases(struct commit *one, struct commit *two)
+static struct commit_list *merge_bases_many(struct commit *one, int n, struct commit **twos)
 {
 	struct commit_list *list = NULL;
 	struct commit_list *result = NULL;
+	int i;
 
-	if (one == two)
-		/* We do not mark this even with RESULT so we do not
-		 * have to clean it up.
-		 */
-		return commit_list_insert(one, &result);
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		if (one == twos[i])
+			/* We do not mark this even with RESULT so we do not
+			 * have to clean it up.
+			 */
+			return commit_list_insert(one, &result);
+	}
 
 	if (parse_commit(one))
 		return NULL;
-	if (parse_commit(two))
-		return NULL;
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		if (parse_commit(twos[i]))
+			return NULL;
+	}
 
 	one->object.flags |= PARENT1;
-	two->object.flags |= PARENT2;
 	insert_by_date(one, &list);
-	insert_by_date(two, &list);
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		twos[i]->object.flags |= PARENT2;
+		insert_by_date(twos[i], &list);
+	}
 
 	while (interesting(list)) {
 		struct commit *commit;
@@ -598,6 +605,11 @@ static struct commit_list *merge_bases(struct commit *one, struct commit *two)
 	return result;
 }
 
+static struct commit_list *merge_bases(struct commit *one, struct commit *two)
+{
+	return merge_bases_many(one, 1, &two);
+}
+
 struct commit_list *get_merge_bases(struct commit *one,
 					struct commit *two, int cleanup)
 {

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-12 17:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-11 20:50 [PATCH 00/10] Build in merge Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50 ` [PATCH 01/10] Move split_cmdline() to alias.c Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50   ` [PATCH 02/10] Move commit_list_count() to commit.c Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50     ` [PATCH 03/10] Move parse-options's skip_prefix() to git-compat-util.h Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50       ` [PATCH 04/10] Add new test to ensure git-merge handles pull.twohead and pull.octopus Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50         ` [PATCH 05/10] parseopt: add a new PARSE_OPT_ARGV0_IS_AN_OPTION option Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50           ` [PATCH 06/10] Move read_cache_unmerged() to read-cache.c Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50             ` [PATCH 07/10] git-fmt-merge-msg: make it usable from other builtins Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50               ` [PATCH 08/10] Introduce get_octopus_merge_bases() in commit.c Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50                 ` [PATCH 09/10] Introduce filter_independent() " Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 20:50                   ` [PATCH 10/10] Build in merge Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 21:17                 ` [PATCH] Introduce get_octopus_merge_bases() in commit.c Miklos Vajna
2008-06-11 23:51                   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-12 16:59                     ` Miklos Vajna
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-06  5:53 [PATCH 09/10] " Junio C Hamano
2008-06-07 21:38 ` [PATCH] " Miklos Vajna
2008-06-09 14:02   ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 22:43     ` Miklos Vajna
2008-06-09 22:55       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-09 23:08         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 23:20           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-09 23:35             ` Miklos Vajna
2008-06-09 23:06       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-09 23:25         ` Miklos Vajna
2008-06-09 23:31         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 23:41           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-10  0:03             ` Miklos Vajna
2008-06-10  2:43               ` Johannes Schindelin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).