From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Beyer Subject: git sequencer prototype Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:38:30 +0200 Message-ID: <1214879914-17866-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> Cc: Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 01 04:39:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KDVmL-00053B-Tw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:39:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755974AbYGACil (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:38:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755090AbYGACil (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:38:41 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33545 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754729AbYGACik (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:38:40 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jul 2008 02:38:38 -0000 Received: from q137.fem.tu-ilmenau.de (EHLO leksak.fem-net) [141.24.46.137] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 01 Jul 2008 04:38:38 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1499303 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Cgvxg5eLC8p94NXviuZzq3Jt13WSWv4+vMes6un Z/QYPD9gCSKjK9 Received: from sbeyer by leksak.fem-net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KDVlK-0004eb-6L; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:38:34 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.5.6.1.130.ga8860.dirty X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.82 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, here is the patchset for the git-sequencer prototype, documentation, test suite and a first git-am and git-rebase-i migration. Indeed, monster patches. ;) I'm using sequencer-based git-am and git-rebase-i and also git-sequencer itself for around 2-3 weeks now. So, for me, it is reality-proven, but I'm curious about your opinions/suggestions in usage and source. The migration patches are a little hard to code-review in the diff-form, but feel free to apply, test, and then look at the code ;) Regards, Stephan