From: Jonathan del Strother <maillist@steelskies.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: spearce@spearce.org,
Jonathan del Strother <jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv>
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "Convert output messages in merge-recursive to past tense."
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:13:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219493636-85340-1-git-send-email-maillist@steelskies.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1219425524-77545-1-git-send-email-maillist@steelskies.com>
From: Jonathan del Strother <jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv>
Now that the progress meter is gone, merge messages make more sense when presented in present tense
This reverts commit 89f40be294363ce4d14ed6931a65561a4e8e9140.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan del Strother <jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv>
---
Sorry about that - that's what I get for trying to do things last thing on a friday.
Adding signed-off, removing the conflict report.
builtin-merge-recursive.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-merge-recursive.c b/builtin-merge-recursive.c
index 43e55bf..dfb363e 100644
--- a/builtin-merge-recursive.c
+++ b/builtin-merge-recursive.c
@@ -729,13 +729,13 @@ static void conflict_rename_rename(struct rename *ren1,
const char *dst_name2 = ren2_dst;
if (string_list_has_string(¤t_directory_set, ren1_dst)) {
dst_name1 = del[delp++] = unique_path(ren1_dst, branch1);
- output(1, "%s is a directory in %s added as %s instead",
+ output(1, "%s is a directory in %s adding as %s instead",
ren1_dst, branch2, dst_name1);
remove_file(0, ren1_dst, 0);
}
if (string_list_has_string(¤t_directory_set, ren2_dst)) {
dst_name2 = del[delp++] = unique_path(ren2_dst, branch2);
- output(1, "%s is a directory in %s added as %s instead",
+ output(1, "%s is a directory in %s adding as %s instead",
ren2_dst, branch1, dst_name2);
remove_file(0, ren2_dst, 0);
}
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static void conflict_rename_dir(struct rename *ren1,
const char *branch1)
{
char *new_path = unique_path(ren1->pair->two->path, branch1);
- output(1, "Renamed %s to %s instead", ren1->pair->one->path, new_path);
+ output(1, "Renaming %s to %s instead", ren1->pair->one->path, new_path);
remove_file(0, ren1->pair->two->path, 0);
update_file(0, ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode, new_path);
free(new_path);
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static void conflict_rename_rename_2(struct rename *ren1,
{
char *new_path1 = unique_path(ren1->pair->two->path, branch1);
char *new_path2 = unique_path(ren2->pair->two->path, branch2);
- output(1, "Renamed %s to %s and %s to %s instead",
+ output(1, "Renaming %s to %s and %s to %s instead",
ren1->pair->one->path, new_path1,
ren2->pair->one->path, new_path2);
remove_file(0, ren1->pair->two->path, 0);
@@ -887,10 +887,10 @@ static int process_renames(struct string_list *a_renames,
branch1,
branch2);
if (mfi.merge || !mfi.clean)
- output(1, "Renamed %s->%s", src, ren1_dst);
+ output(1, "Renaming %s->%s", src, ren1_dst);
if (mfi.merge)
- output(2, "Auto-merged %s", ren1_dst);
+ output(2, "Auto-merging %s", ren1_dst);
if (!mfi.clean) {
output(1, "CONFLICT (content): merge conflict in %s",
@@ -924,14 +924,14 @@ static int process_renames(struct string_list *a_renames,
if (string_list_has_string(¤t_directory_set, ren1_dst)) {
clean_merge = 0;
- output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/directory): Renamed %s->%s in %s "
+ output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename %s->%s in %s "
" directory %s added in %s",
ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
ren1_dst, branch2);
conflict_rename_dir(ren1, branch1);
} else if (sha_eq(src_other.sha1, null_sha1)) {
clean_merge = 0;
- output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/delete): Renamed %s->%s in %s "
+ output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/delete): Rename %s->%s in %s "
"and deleted in %s",
ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
branch2);
@@ -940,19 +940,19 @@ static int process_renames(struct string_list *a_renames,
const char *new_path;
clean_merge = 0;
try_merge = 1;
- output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/add): Renamed %s->%s in %s. "
+ output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/add): Rename %s->%s in %s. "
"%s added in %s",
ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
ren1_dst, branch2);
new_path = unique_path(ren1_dst, branch2);
- output(1, "Added as %s instead", new_path);
+ output(1, "Adding as %s instead", new_path);
update_file(0, dst_other.sha1, dst_other.mode, new_path);
} else if ((item = string_list_lookup(ren1_dst, renames2Dst))) {
ren2 = item->util;
clean_merge = 0;
ren2->processed = 1;
- output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/rename): Renamed %s->%s in %s. "
- "Renamed %s->%s in %s",
+ output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/rename): Rename %s->%s in %s. "
+ "Rename %s->%s in %s",
ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
ren2->pair->one->path, ren2->pair->two->path, branch2);
conflict_rename_rename_2(ren1, branch1, ren2, branch2);
@@ -986,9 +986,9 @@ static int process_renames(struct string_list *a_renames,
output(3, "Skipped %s (merged same as existing)", ren1_dst);
else {
if (mfi.merge || !mfi.clean)
- output(1, "Renamed %s => %s", ren1_src, ren1_dst);
+ output(1, "Renaming %s => %s", ren1_src, ren1_dst);
if (mfi.merge)
- output(2, "Auto-merged %s", ren1_dst);
+ output(2, "Auto-merging %s", ren1_dst);
if (!mfi.clean) {
output(1, "CONFLICT (rename/modify): Merge conflict in %s",
ren1_dst);
@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ static int process_entry(const char *path, struct stage_data *entry,
/* Deleted in both or deleted in one and
* unchanged in the other */
if (a_sha)
- output(2, "Removed %s", path);
+ output(2, "Removing %s", path);
/* do not touch working file if it did not exist */
remove_file(1, path, !a_sha);
} else {
@@ -1086,12 +1086,12 @@ static int process_entry(const char *path, struct stage_data *entry,
const char *new_path = unique_path(path, add_branch);
clean_merge = 0;
output(1, "CONFLICT (%s): There is a directory with name %s in %s. "
- "Added %s as %s",
+ "Adding %s as %s",
conf, path, other_branch, path, new_path);
remove_file(0, path, 0);
update_file(0, sha, mode, new_path);
} else {
- output(2, "Added %s", path);
+ output(2, "Adding %s", path);
update_file(1, sha, mode, path);
}
} else if (a_sha && b_sha) {
@@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static int process_entry(const char *path, struct stage_data *entry,
reason = "add/add";
o_sha = (unsigned char *)null_sha1;
}
- output(2, "Auto-merged %s", path);
+ output(2, "Auto-merging %s", path);
o.path = a.path = b.path = (char *)path;
hashcpy(o.sha1, o_sha);
o.mode = o_mode;
--
1.6.0.6.gc667.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-23 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-22 17:18 [PATCH] Revert "Convert output messages in merge-recursive to past tense." Jonathan del Strother
2008-08-22 22:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-22 23:03 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-08-23 12:13 ` Jonathan del Strother [this message]
2008-08-23 12:14 ` Jonathan del Strother
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219493636-85340-1-git-send-email-maillist@steelskies.com \
--to=maillist@steelskies.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).