git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] checkout -m: recreate merge when checking out of unmerged index
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:42:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220056963-2352-13-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1220056963-2352-12-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>

This teaches git-checkout to recreate a merge out of unmerged
index entries while resolving conflicts.

With this patch, checking out an unmerged path from the index
now have the following possibilities:

 * Without any option, an attempt to checkout an unmerged path
   will atomically fail (i.e. no other cleanly-merged paths are
   checked out either);

 * With "-f", other cleanly-merged paths are checked out, and
   unmerged paths are ignored;

 * With "--ours" or "--theirs, the contents from the specified
   stage is checked out;

 * With "-m" (we should add "--merge" as synonym), the 3-way merge
   is recreated from the staged object names and checked out.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 builtin-checkout.c |  115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 t/t7201-co.sh      |   63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin-checkout.c b/builtin-checkout.c
index bdfdb65..8b5da7f 100644
--- a/builtin-checkout.c
+++ b/builtin-checkout.c
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
 #include "diff.h"
 #include "revision.h"
 #include "remote.h"
+#include "blob.h"
+#include "xdiff-interface.h"
+#include "ll-merge.h"
 
 static const char * const checkout_usage[] = {
 	"git checkout [options] <branch>",
@@ -109,6 +112,19 @@ static int check_stage(int stage, struct cache_entry *ce, int pos)
 		     (stage == 2) ? "our" : "their");
 }
 
+static int check_all_stage(struct cache_entry *ce, int pos)
+{
+	if (ce_stage(ce) != 1 ||
+	    active_nr <= pos + 2 ||
+	    strcmp(active_cache[pos+1]->name, ce->name) ||
+	    ce_stage(active_cache[pos+1]) != 2 ||
+	    strcmp(active_cache[pos+2]->name, ce->name) ||
+	    ce_stage(active_cache[pos+2]) != 3)
+		return error("path '%s' does not have all three versions",
+			     ce->name);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int checkout_stage(int stage, struct cache_entry *ce, int pos,
 			  struct checkout *state)
 {
@@ -123,6 +139,77 @@ static int checkout_stage(int stage, struct cache_entry *ce, int pos,
 		     (stage == 2) ? "our" : "their");
 }
 
+/* NEEDSWORK: share with merge-recursive */
+static void fill_mm(const unsigned char *sha1, mmfile_t *mm)
+{
+	unsigned long size;
+	enum object_type type;
+
+	if (!hashcmp(sha1, null_sha1)) {
+		mm->ptr = xstrdup("");
+		mm->size = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	mm->ptr = read_sha1_file(sha1, &type, &size);
+	if (!mm->ptr || type != OBJ_BLOB)
+		die("unable to read blob object %s", sha1_to_hex(sha1));
+	mm->size = size;
+}
+
+static int checkout_merged(int pos, struct checkout *state)
+{
+	struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[pos];
+	const char *path = ce->name;
+	mmfile_t ancestor, ours, theirs;
+	int status;
+	unsigned char sha1[20];
+	mmbuffer_t result_buf;
+
+	if (ce_stage(ce) != 1 ||
+	    active_nr <= pos + 2 ||
+	    strcmp(active_cache[pos+1]->name, path) ||
+	    ce_stage(active_cache[pos+1]) != 2 ||
+	    strcmp(active_cache[pos+2]->name, path) ||
+	    ce_stage(active_cache[pos+2]) != 3)
+		return error("path '%s' does not have all 3 versions", path);
+
+	fill_mm(active_cache[pos]->sha1, &ancestor);
+	fill_mm(active_cache[pos+1]->sha1, &ours);
+	fill_mm(active_cache[pos+2]->sha1, &theirs);
+
+	status = ll_merge(&result_buf, path, &ancestor,
+			  &ours, "ours", &theirs, "theirs", 1);
+	free(ancestor.ptr);
+	free(ours.ptr);
+	free(theirs.ptr);
+	if (status < 0 || !result_buf.ptr) {
+		free(result_buf.ptr);
+		return error("path '%s': cannot merge", path);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * NEEDSWORK:
+	 * There is absolutely no reason to write this as a blob object
+	 * and create a phoney cache entry just to leak.  This hack is
+	 * primarily to get to the write_entry() machinery that massages
+	 * the contents to work-tree format and writes out which only
+	 * allows it for a cache entry.  The code in write_entry() needs
+	 * to be refactored to allow us to feed a <buffer, size, mode>
+	 * instead of a cache entry.  Such a refactoring would help
+	 * merge_recursive as well (it also writes the merge result to the
+	 * object database even when it may contain conflicts).
+	 */
+	if (write_sha1_file(result_buf.ptr, result_buf.size,
+			    blob_type, sha1))
+		die("Unable to add merge result for '%s'", path);
+	ce = make_cache_entry(create_ce_mode(active_cache[pos+1]->ce_mode),
+			      sha1,
+			      path, 2, 0);
+	status = checkout_entry(ce, state, NULL);
+	return status;
+}
+
 static int checkout_paths(struct tree *source_tree, const char **pathspec,
 			  struct checkout_opts *opts)
 {
@@ -134,7 +221,7 @@ static int checkout_paths(struct tree *source_tree, const char **pathspec,
 	struct commit *head;
 	int errs = 0;
 	int stage = opts->writeout_stage;
-
+	int merge = opts->merge;
 	int newfd;
 	struct lock_file *lock_file = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct lock_file));
 
@@ -166,6 +253,8 @@ static int checkout_paths(struct tree *source_tree, const char **pathspec,
 				errs |= check_stage(stage, ce, pos);
 			} else if (opts->force) {
 				warning("path '%s' is unmerged", ce->name);
+			} else if (opts->merge) {
+				errs |= check_all_stage(ce, pos);
 			} else {
 				errs = 1;
 				error("path '%s' is unmerged", ce->name);
@@ -184,13 +273,15 @@ static int checkout_paths(struct tree *source_tree, const char **pathspec,
 	for (pos = 0; pos < active_nr; pos++) {
 		struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[pos];
 		if (pathspec_match(pathspec, NULL, ce->name, 0)) {
-			if (ce_stage(ce)) {
-				if (stage)
-					errs |= checkout_stage(stage, ce, pos, &state);
-				pos = skip_same_name(ce, pos) - 1;
+			if (!ce_stage(ce)) {
+				errs |= checkout_entry(ce, &state, NULL);
 				continue;
 			}
-			errs |= checkout_entry(ce, &state, NULL);
+			if (stage)
+				errs |= checkout_stage(stage, ce, pos, &state);
+			else if (merge)
+				errs |= checkout_merged(pos, &state);
+			pos = skip_same_name(ce, pos) - 1;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -478,6 +569,11 @@ static int switch_branches(struct checkout_opts *opts, struct branch_info *new)
 	return ret || opts->writeout_error;
 }
 
+static int git_checkout_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
+{
+	return git_xmerge_config(var, value, cb);
+}
+
 int cmd_checkout(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 {
 	struct checkout_opts opts;
@@ -504,7 +600,7 @@ int cmd_checkout(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 	memset(&opts, 0, sizeof(opts));
 	memset(&new, 0, sizeof(new));
 
-	git_config(git_default_config, NULL);
+	git_config(git_checkout_config, NULL);
 
 	opts.track = BRANCH_TRACK_UNSPECIFIED;
 
@@ -611,7 +707,7 @@ no_reference:
 			die("invalid path specification");
 
 		/* Checkout paths */
-		if (opts.new_branch || opts.merge) {
+		if (opts.new_branch) {
 			if (argc == 1) {
 				die("git checkout: updating paths is incompatible with switching branches.\nDid you intend to checkout '%s' which can not be resolved as commit?", argv[0]);
 			} else {
@@ -619,6 +715,9 @@ no_reference:
 			}
 		}
 
+		if (1 < !!opts.writeout_stage + !!opts.force + !!opts.merge)
+			die("git checkout: --ours/--theirs, --force and --merge are incompatible when\nchecking out of the index.");
+
 		return checkout_paths(source_tree, pathspec, &opts);
 	}
 
diff --git a/t/t7201-co.sh b/t/t7201-co.sh
index 85c792c..6016915 100755
--- a/t/t7201-co.sh
+++ b/t/t7201-co.sh
@@ -439,4 +439,67 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout unmerged stage' '
 	test ztheirside = "z$(cat file)"
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'checkout with --merge' '
+	rm -f .git/index &&
+	O=$(echo original | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+	A=$(echo ourside | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+	B=$(echo theirside | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+	(
+		echo "100644 $A 0	fild" &&
+		echo "100644 $O 1	file" &&
+		echo "100644 $A 2	file" &&
+		echo "100644 $B 3	file" &&
+		echo "100644 $A 0	filf"
+	) | git update-index --index-info &&
+	echo "none of the above" >sample &&
+	echo ourside >expect &&
+	cat sample >fild &&
+	cat sample >file &&
+	cat sample >filf &&
+	git checkout -m -- fild file filf &&
+	(
+		echo "<<<<<<< ours"
+		echo ourside
+		echo "======="
+		echo theirside
+		echo ">>>>>>> theirs"
+	) >merged &&
+	test_cmp expect fild &&
+	test_cmp expect filf &&
+	test_cmp merged file
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'checkout with --merge, in diff3 -m style' '
+	git config merge.conflictstyle diff3 &&
+	rm -f .git/index &&
+	O=$(echo original | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+	A=$(echo ourside | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+	B=$(echo theirside | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+	(
+		echo "100644 $A 0	fild" &&
+		echo "100644 $O 1	file" &&
+		echo "100644 $A 2	file" &&
+		echo "100644 $B 3	file" &&
+		echo "100644 $A 0	filf"
+	) | git update-index --index-info &&
+	echo "none of the above" >sample &&
+	echo ourside >expect &&
+	cat sample >fild &&
+	cat sample >file &&
+	cat sample >filf &&
+	git checkout -m -- fild file filf &&
+	(
+		echo "<<<<<<< ours"
+		echo ourside
+		echo "|||||||"
+		echo original
+		echo "======="
+		echo theirside
+		echo ">>>>>>> theirs"
+	) >merged &&
+	test_cmp expect fild &&
+	test_cmp expect filf &&
+	test_cmp merged file
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
1.6.0.1.149.ga4c44

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-30  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-30  0:42 [PATCH 00/12] Towards a better merge resolution support Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42 ` [PATCH 01/12] xdl_fill_merge_buffer(): separate out a too deeply nested function Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42   ` [PATCH 02/12] xdiff-merge: optionally show conflicts in "diff3 -m" style Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42     ` [PATCH 03/12] xmerge.c: minimum readability fixups Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42       ` [PATCH 04/12] xmerge.c: "diff3 -m" style clips merge reduction level to EAGER or less Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42         ` [PATCH 05/12] rerere.c: use symbolic constants to keep track of parsing states Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42           ` [PATCH 06/12] rerere: understand "diff3 -m" style conflicts with the original Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42             ` [PATCH 07/12] merge.conflictstyle: choose between "merge" and "diff3 -m" styles Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42               ` [PATCH 08/12] git-merge-recursive: learn to honor merge.conflictstyle Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42                 ` [PATCH 09/12] checkout: do not check out unmerged higher stages randomly Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42                   ` [PATCH 10/12] checkout: allow ignoring unmerged paths when checking out of the index Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42                     ` [PATCH 11/12] checkout --ours/--theirs Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  0:42                       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-08-30  9:42               ` [PATCH 07/12] merge.conflictstyle: choose between "merge" and "diff3 -m" styles Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-30  9:34         ` [PATCH 04/12] xmerge.c: "diff3 -m" style clips merge reduction level to EAGER or less Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-30  9:31       ` [PATCH 03/12] xmerge.c: minimum readability fixups Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-30 15:42         ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30  9:29     ` [PATCH 02/12] xdiff-merge: optionally show conflicts in "diff3 -m" style Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-30  9:14   ` [PATCH 01/12] xdl_fill_merge_buffer(): separate out a too deeply nested function Johannes Schindelin
2008-09-01  9:39 ` [PATCH 00/12] Towards a better merge resolution support Alex Riesen
2008-09-01  9:44 ` Alex Riesen
2008-09-01  9:50   ` Abhijit Menon-Sen
2008-09-01 12:20     ` Thomas Rast
2008-09-01 10:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-01 11:34     ` Alex Riesen
2008-09-01 17:26       ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1220056963-2352-13-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).