From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] TopGit v0.3 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:27:13 +0200 Organization: lilypond-design.org Message-ID: <1221222433.29747.8.camel@heerbeest> References: <20080909231009.GD10544@machine.or.cz> <1221120192.8962.7.camel@heerbeest> <20080912110017.GW10360@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Baudis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 12 14:28:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ke7lC-0001lP-TJ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:28:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753449AbYILM1S (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:27:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753203AbYILM1S (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:27:18 -0400 Received: from edu-smtp-02.edutel.nl ([88.159.1.222]:49895 "EHLO edu-smtp-02.edutel.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752728AbYILM1R (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:27:17 -0400 Received: from heerbeest (unknown [88.159.206.46]) by edu-smtp-02.edutel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23CC11E7EF; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:27:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by heerbeest (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCC8DC171; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:27:14 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20080912110017.GW10360@machine.or.cz> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.23.91 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On vr, 2008-09-12 at 13:00 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > But this is rewriting history, isn't it? No (that would be useless), see http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2008/8/13/2925144 #first tg redepend idea I've just implemented the second idea http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2008/8/15/2954214 but haven't got any time to test it yet. Then there's also http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2008/8/15/2952004 to consider. > Currently, I'm thinking that something like .topundeps (or !-prefixing > dependencies in .topdeps) is the only way to implement this... Yeah, i've been thinking that too. It would be nice if we could hack around that. It seems that the two redepend ideas get around it at the expense of creating the whole list of dependencies, which is much too expensive for my taste. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org