From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kristis Makris Subject: Re: Git and tagging hook Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:30:02 -0700 Message-ID: <1223400602.20250.2.camel@localhost> References: <1223268332.4072.7.camel@localhost> <48E9BC54.5070609@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_talos-7265-1223400761-0001-2" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 07 19:31:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KnGOy-0007qj-VL for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:31:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753507AbYJGRaE (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:30:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751671AbYJGRaE (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:30:04 -0400 Received: from 11-74-162-69.static.reverse.lstn.net ([69.162.74.11]:43184 "EHLO mail.loomcm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751245AbYJGRaD (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:30:03 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.71] ([::ffff:67.40.69.52]) by talos with esmtp; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:32:40 -0700 id 076D0018.48EB9D38.00001C61 In-Reply-To: <48E9BC54.5070609@op5.se> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages. --=_talos-7265-1223400761-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 09:20 +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Next time, don't include a members-only list in the CC, please. The > usual action when replying to an email on git@vger is to "Reply All", > which doesn't play nicely with such lists and will render one list > archive incomplete (since people will inevitably cull that other > list from their CC's after having sent to it once). Why would they cull that other list, if the usual action is to "Reply All" ? --=_talos-7265-1223400761-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBI65ya/KuTDwnYLxERAougAJwIMO3JHpgNjzj+F+zoU24n688CpACgr7Cu PpQxn4vmF20ZsZmxD+jt+Ak= =aJvP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_talos-7265-1223400761-0001-2--