From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Cevey Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2009, #02; Sun, 11) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:28:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1232548106.4977310a95d8f@mail.nimag.net> References: <7v63kmtbk6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vwsd1pjst.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <200901120225.30175.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Giuseppe Bilotta To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 21 15:37:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LPeC4-0003uL-KN for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:36:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754377AbZAUOfM (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:35:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754267AbZAUOfM (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:35:12 -0500 Received: from mail.hebweb.net ([62.220.136.4]:51737 "HELO mail-unsh.hebweb.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754203AbZAUOfL (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:35:11 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 399 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:35:10 EST Received: (qmail 27771 invoked by uid 33); 21 Jan 2009 14:28:26 -0000 Received: from 146.101.142.69 ([146.101.142.69]) by mail.nimag.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:28:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200901120225.30175.jnareb@gmail.com> User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 146.101.142.69 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Selon Jakub Narebski : Hello, Sorry for not responding earlier, I was quite busy being ill and moving abroad for a new job. > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> [Actively cooking] > >>> > >>> * sc/gitweb-category (Fri Dec 12 00:45:12 2008 +0100) 3 commits > >>> - gitweb: Optional grouping of projects by category > >>> - gitweb: Split git_project_list_body in two functions > >>> - gitweb: Modularized git_get_project_description to be more generic > >> > >> This I think needs some further cooking. I guess with addition of one > >> more patch to series categories could be sorted together with projects > >> they contain, and not always have to be in fixed ordering. > > > > These should be moved to the Stalled category; nobody seems to be > > discussing improvements and sending updates to the series as far as I > > recall. > > I think it is just the author being slow moving; there was quite > a bit of time between subsequent versions of this patch series. I don't recall what was left to do on top of the series of patches I submitted, could you refresh my mind on that if it still needs to be done? I remember the discussion trailing off as categorized ordering was being discussed.. -- Sebastien Cevey - inso.cc