From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zabre <427@free.fr> Subject: Re: (beginner) git rm Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:05:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1233176743011-2234918.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1233137498146-2231416.post@n2.nabble.com> <1233140751523-2231622.post@n2.nabble.com> <49804385.908@dbservice.com> <1233144045221-2231849.post@n2.nabble.com> <49804D41.3010801@dbservice.com> <1233166992184-2233892.post@n2.nabble.com> <20090128201727.GD7503@atjola.homenet> <1233175322729-2234796.post@n2.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 28 22:07:39 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LSHcx-00026m-2H for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:07:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757186AbZA1VFp (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:05:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752275AbZA1VFp (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:05:45 -0500 Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:37605 "EHLO kuber.nabble.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751947AbZA1VFn (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:05:43 -0500 Received: from tervel.nabble.com ([192.168.236.150]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LSHbT-0002PI-0e for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:05:43 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1233175322729-2234796.post@n2.nabble.com> X-Nabble-From: 427@free.fr Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Zabre wrote: > > Oh just one (probably stupid) thing : does represent a > directory being the root of a tree of folders (which has been added to the > index), does it? > This is the way I understand it at the moment. It must be a convention I > don't know just yet. (I need to investigate on this) > Ok I found in the doc (in the "The Object Database" section) what trees are about, seems a little bit more obscure, so I guess I'm not ready for this right now. (I'm a beginner trying to use git for a simple regular workflow, managing code and other documents) http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#the-object-database I guess refers to such an object, and you use it in order to revert it from the Object Database. I'll keep this idea in mind for when I'll try to restore data from tricky last-chance "stores", there is a section about such things in the doc : http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#fixing-mistakes I think that in a normal everyday use, the small index modification I can do using the previous advices can do the job (or am I wrong?) -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/%28beginner%29-git-rm-tp2231416p2234918.html Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com.