From: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] builtin-remote: make rm operation safer in mirrored repository
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:51:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233683473-87893-2-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233683473-87893-1-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <76718490902030638y36299191i1fcc2ab8646b9593@mail.gmail.com>
"git remote rm <repo>" is happy to remove non-remote branches (and their
reflogs). This may be okay if the repository truely is a mirror, but if the
user had done "git remote add --mirror <repo>" by accident and was just
undoing their mistake, then they are left in a situation that is difficult to
recover from.
After this commit, "git remote rm" skips over non-remote branches and instead
advises the user on how to remove such branches using "git branch -d", which
itself has nice safety checks wrt to branch removal lacking from "git remote
rm".
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
---
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>> However, I have one small nit. The output produces long lines with a lot
>> of repeated text (assuming you have multiple matched branches, which is
>> likely if you have a mirrored setup). So maybe it would be nicer to have
>> something like:
>>
>> warning: non-remote branches were not removed; you can delete them with:
>> git branch -d master
>> git branch -d next
>> git branch -d topic
>>
>> which is a little more obvious (to me, anyway), and allows you to cut
>> and paste if you really did want to delete them.
>
> Thanks for a review, and I actually shared that exact nit when I first
> read the patch. It would be a very good change to collect them in a list
> and show a single warning at the end (I do not have particular preference
> about the cut & paste-ability either way myself).
So much work for what seemed such a minor change. :) I hope this version is
well-polished enough.
builtin-remote.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
t/t5505-remote.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-remote.c b/builtin-remote.c
index 21885fb..ae1eed4 100644
--- a/builtin-remote.c
+++ b/builtin-remote.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int add_known_remote(struct remote *remote, void *cb_data)
struct branches_for_remote {
struct remote *remote;
- struct string_list *branches;
+ struct string_list *branches, *skipped;
struct known_remotes *keep;
};
@@ -323,6 +323,14 @@ static int add_branch_for_removal(const char *refname,
return 0;
}
+ /* don't delete non-remote branches */
+ if (prefixcmp(refname, "refs/remotes")) {
+ if (!prefixcmp(refname, "refs/heads/"))
+ string_list_append(abbrev_branch(refname),
+ branches->skipped);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/* make sure that symrefs are deleted */
if (flags & REF_ISSYMREF)
return unlink(git_path("%s", refname));
@@ -542,7 +550,10 @@ static int rm(int argc, const char **argv)
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
struct known_remotes known_remotes = { NULL, NULL };
struct string_list branches = { NULL, 0, 0, 1 };
- struct branches_for_remote cb_data = { NULL, &branches, &known_remotes };
+ struct string_list skipped = { NULL, 0, 0, 1 };
+ struct branches_for_remote cb_data = {
+ NULL, &branches, &skipped, &known_remotes
+ };
int i, result;
if (argc != 2)
@@ -590,6 +601,18 @@ static int rm(int argc, const char **argv)
result = remove_branches(&branches);
string_list_clear(&branches, 1);
+ if (skipped.nr) {
+ fprintf(stderr, skipped.nr == 1 ?
+ "Note: A non-remote branch was not removed; "
+ "to delete it, use:\n" :
+ "Note: Non-remote branches were not removed; "
+ "to delete them, use:\n");
+ for (i = 0; i < skipped.nr; i++)
+ fprintf(stderr, " git branch -d %s\n",
+ skipped.items[i].string);
+ }
+ string_list_clear(&skipped, 0);
+
return result;
}
diff --git a/t/t5505-remote.sh b/t/t5505-remote.sh
index 1f59960..bc5b7ce 100755
--- a/t/t5505-remote.sh
+++ b/t/t5505-remote.sh
@@ -107,6 +107,32 @@ test_expect_success 'remove remote' '
)
'
+test_expect_success 'remove remote protects non-remote branches' '
+(
+ cd test &&
+ (cat >expect1 <<EOF
+Note: A non-remote branch was not removed; to delete it, use:
+ git branch -d master
+EOF
+ cat >expect2 <<EOF
+Note: Non-remote branches were not removed; to delete them, use:
+ git branch -d foobranch
+ git branch -d master
+EOF
+) &&
+ git tag footag
+ git config --add remote.oops.fetch "+refs/*:refs/*" &&
+ git remote rm oops 2>actual1 &&
+ git branch foobranch &&
+ git config --add remote.oops.fetch "+refs/*:refs/*" &&
+ git remote rm oops 2>actual2 &&
+ git branch -d foobranch &&
+ git tag -d footag &&
+ test_cmp expect1 actual1 &&
+ test_cmp expect2 actual2
+)
+'
+
cat > test/expect << EOF
* remote origin
URL: $(pwd)/one
--
1.6.1.2.311.g2d7f3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-01 14:52 git remote rm considered harmful? Jay Soffian
2009-02-01 15:48 ` [PATCH] builtin-remote: make rm operation safer in mirrored repository Jay Soffian
2009-02-02 13:29 ` Jeff King
2009-02-02 13:36 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-02 18:40 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-03 7:24 ` Jeff King
2009-02-03 7:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-03 14:38 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-03 14:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-03 17:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] builtin-remote: make rm() use properly named variable to hold return value Jay Soffian
2009-02-04 15:34 ` Jeff King
2009-02-03 17:51 ` Jay Soffian [this message]
2009-02-04 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] builtin-remote: make rm operation safer in mirrored repository Jeff King
2009-02-04 15:56 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-04 16:06 ` [PATCH] " Jay Soffian
2009-02-04 16:18 ` Jeff King
2009-02-04 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233683473-87893-2-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com \
--to=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).