From: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5] Test fsck a bit harder
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:32:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235946763-15252-1-git-send-email-trast@student.ethz.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902212021.37807.j6t@kdbg.org>
git-fsck, of all tools, has very few tests. This adds some more:
* a corrupted object;
* a branch pointing to a non-commit;
* a tag pointing to a nonexistent object;
* and a tag pointing to an object of a type other than what the tag
itself claims.
Some of the involved shell programming is due to Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
---
Sorry for taking so long to fix this.
Johannes Sixt wrote:
> This is wrong: It does not test the exist status. In a pipeline, the shell
> looks only at the exit status of the last command. You really want this as
>
> test_must_fail git fsck >out 2>&1 &&
You're right.
> If you want to have it more verbose, add 'cat out &&'. But IMHO that is
> overengineered. If the test detects a regression in the future, it is easy to
> inspect the file out if necessary.
I usually try to write the tests such that the cause of failure should
be reasonably obvious from the verbose output. But I don't really
care enough to insert stray cats either...
t/t1450-fsck.sh | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t1450-fsck.sh b/t/t1450-fsck.sh
index 4597af0..d4a83a1 100755
--- a/t/t1450-fsck.sh
+++ b/t/t1450-fsck.sh
@@ -28,4 +28,73 @@ test_expect_success 'loose objects borrowed from alternate are not missing' '
)
'
+# Corruption tests follow. Make sure to remove all traces of the
+# specific corruption you test afterwards, lest a later test trip over
+# it.
+
+test_expect_success 'object with bad sha1' '
+ sha=$(echo blob | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+ echo $sha &&
+ old=$(echo $sha | sed "s+^..+&/+") &&
+ new=${old%/*}/ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff &&
+ sha=${new%/*}${new##*/} &&
+ mv .git/objects/$old .git/objects/$new &&
+ git update-index --add --cacheinfo 100644 $sha foo &&
+ tree=$(git write-tree) &&
+ cmt=$(echo bogus | git commit-tree $tree) &&
+ git update-ref refs/heads/bogus $cmt &&
+ test_must_fail git fsck >out 2>&1 &&
+ grep "$sha.*corrupt" out
+'
+
+rm -f .git/objects/$new
+git update-ref -d refs/heads/bogus
+git read-tree -u --reset HEAD
+
+test_expect_success 'branch pointing to non-commit' '
+ git rev-parse HEAD^{tree} > .git/refs/heads/invalid &&
+ git fsck 2>&1 | tee out &&
+ grep "not a commit" out
+'
+
+git update-ref -d refs/heads/invalid
+
+cat > invalid-tag <<EOF
+object ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
+type commit
+tag invalid
+tagger T A Gger <tagger@example.com> 1234567890 -0000
+
+This is an invalid tag.
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'tag pointing to nonexistent' '
+ tag=$(git hash-object -t tag -w --stdin < invalid-tag) &&
+ echo $tag > .git/refs/tags/invalid &&
+ test_must_fail git fsck >out 2>&1 &&
+ grep "missing commit ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff" out
+'
+
+rm .git/refs/tags/invalid
+rm -f .git/objects/$(echo $tag | sed "s#^..#&/#")
+
+cat > wrong-tag <<EOF
+object $(echo blob | git hash-object -w --stdin)
+type commit
+tag wrong
+tagger T A Gger <tagger@example.com> 1234567890 -0000
+
+This is an invalid tag.
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'tag pointing to something else than its type' '
+ tag=$(git hash-object -t tag -w --stdin < wrong-tag) &&
+ echo $tag > .git/refs/tags/wrong &&
+ test_must_fail git fsck >out 2>&1 &&
+ grep "Object.*is a blob, not a commit" out
+'
+
+rm .git/refs/tags/wrong
+
+
test_done
--
1.6.2.rc2.289.g2fa25
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-01 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-19 1:42 What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2009, #06; Wed, 18) Junio C Hamano
2009-02-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Support coverage testing with GCC/gcov Thomas Rast
2009-02-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] " Thomas Rast
2009-02-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] Test that diff can read from stdin Thomas Rast
2009-02-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] Test diff --dirstat functionality Thomas Rast
2009-02-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] Test log --graph Thomas Rast
2009-02-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] Test fsck a bit harder Thomas Rast
2009-02-20 19:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Thomas Rast
2009-02-20 20:29 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-02-21 11:25 ` [PATCH v4] " Thomas Rast
2009-02-21 19:21 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-03-01 22:32 ` Thomas Rast [this message]
2009-03-03 7:31 ` [PATCH v5] " Junio C Hamano
2009-02-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] Test log --decorate Thomas Rast
2009-02-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] Test rev-list --parents/--children Thomas Rast
2009-02-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] Test git-patch-id Thomas Rast
2009-02-19 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Support coverage testing with GCC/gcov Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-19 14:11 ` Thomas Rast
2009-02-19 14:09 ` Sverre Rabbelier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235946763-15252-1-git-send-email-trast@student.ethz.ch \
--to=trast@student.ethz.ch \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).