git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [JGIT PATCH 00/12] Improve test coverage in revwalk
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:40:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1237340451-31562-1-git-send-email-spearce@spearce.org> (raw)

Most of these patches are to improve the test coverage within the
revwalk package.


The last commit points out what I feared, which is that a RevWalk
with a PathFilter applied doesn't produce the same results that
git-core would produce in the same situation.  We're either missing
some functions necessary to implement it, or we flat out produce
a wrong graph in some cases.

The tests are commented out because JUnit doesn't have a notion of
"known broken".  But I did leave in TODO comments.  I'd like to
apply the test, and then work later to improve it, but I'm open
to suggestions.


Shawn O. Pearce (12):
  Fix copyright year in revwalk test file headers
  Mark non-overridable methods of RevObject final
  Change RevWalkTestCase to use RevCommit, not ObjectId
  Test that RevFilter.MERGE_BASE cannot use a TreeFilter
  Add unit tests for DateRevQueue
  Add unit tests for FIFORevQueue
  Add unit tests for LIFORevQueue
  Add unit tests for AbstractRevQueue.EMPTY_QUEUE
  Add tests for basic RevObject methods related to type, flags
  Add tests for ObjectWalk
  Add some basic logic tests for TreeFilter on RevWalk
  Implement git-core t/t6012-rev-list-simplify test case

 .../jgit/revwalk/AlwaysEmptyRevQueueTest.java      |   63 +++++++
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/DateRevQueueTest.java |  118 ++++++++++++
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/FIFORevQueueTest.java |   81 +++++++++
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/LIFORevQueueTest.java |   69 +++++++
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/ObjectWalkTest.java   |  190 ++++++++++++++++++++
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevFlagSetTest.java   |    2 +-
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevObjectTest.java    |  171 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevQueueTestCase.java |   85 +++++++++
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevWalkCullTest.java  |   30 ++--
 .../spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevWalkFilterTest.java    |   93 +++++-----
 .../spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevWalkMergeBaseTest.java |   64 ++++---
 .../jgit/revwalk/RevWalkPathFilter1Test.java       |  176 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../jgit/revwalk/RevWalkPathFilter6012Test.java    |  162 +++++++++++++++++
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevWalkSortTest.java  |   66 ++++----
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevWalkTestCase.java  |  110 ++++++++++--
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/AbstractRevQueue.java |    2 +-
 .../org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/BlockRevQueue.java    |    2 +-
 .../src/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevObject.java    |   20 +-
 18 files changed, 1353 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/AlwaysEmptyRevQueueTest.java
 create mode 100644 org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/DateRevQueueTest.java
 create mode 100644 org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/FIFORevQueueTest.java
 create mode 100644 org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/LIFORevQueueTest.java
 create mode 100644 org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/ObjectWalkTest.java
 create mode 100644 org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevObjectTest.java
 create mode 100644 org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevQueueTestCase.java
 create mode 100644 org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevWalkPathFilter1Test.java
 create mode 100644 org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevWalkPathFilter6012Test.java

             reply	other threads:[~2009-03-18  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-18  1:40 Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2009-03-18  1:40 ` [JGIT PATCH 01/12] Fix copyright year in revwalk test file headers Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40   ` [JGIT PATCH 02/12] Mark non-overridable methods of RevObject final Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40     ` [JGIT PATCH 03/12] Change RevWalkTestCase to use RevCommit, not ObjectId Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40       ` [JGIT PATCH 04/12] Test that RevFilter.MERGE_BASE cannot use a TreeFilter Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40         ` [JGIT PATCH 05/12] Add unit tests for DateRevQueue Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40           ` [JGIT PATCH 06/12] Add unit tests for FIFORevQueue Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40             ` [JGIT PATCH 07/12] Add unit tests for LIFORevQueue Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40               ` [JGIT PATCH 08/12] Add unit tests for AbstractRevQueue.EMPTY_QUEUE Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40                 ` [JGIT PATCH 09/12] Add tests for basic RevObject methods related to type, flags Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40                   ` [JGIT PATCH 10/12] Add tests for ObjectWalk Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40                     ` [JGIT PATCH 11/12] Add some basic logic tests for TreeFilter on RevWalk Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  1:40                       ` [JGIT PATCH 12/12] Implement git-core t/t6012-rev-list-simplify test case Shawn O. Pearce
2009-03-18  6:34 ` [JGIT PATCH 00/12] Improve test coverage in revwalk Robin Rosenberg
2009-03-18  9:21   ` Robin Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1237340451-31562-1-git-send-email-spearce@spearce.org \
    --to=spearce@spearce.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.rosenberg@dewire.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).