[PATCH 3/3] simplify output of conflicting merge

[Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>]

This simplifies the code without changing the semantics and removes
the unhelpful "needs $sha1" part of the conflicting submodule message.

Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
---
 merge-recursive.c |   17 ++++-------------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index f1b120b..d6f0582 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -1116,22 +1116,13 @@ static int process_entry(struct merge_options *o,
 				 o->branch1, o->branch2);
 
 		clean_merge = mfi.clean;
-		if (mfi.clean)
-			update_file(o, 1, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path);
-		else if (S_ISGITLINK(mfi.mode)) {
-			output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (submodule): Merge conflict in %s "
-			       "- needs %s", path, sha1_to_hex(b.sha1));
-			update_file(o, 0, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path);
-		} else {
+		if (!mfi.clean) {
+			if (S_ISGITLINK(mfi.mode))
+				reason = "submodule";
 			output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (%s): Merge conflict in %s",
 					reason, path);
-
-			if (o->call_depth)
-				update_file(o, 0, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path);
-			else
-				update_file_flags(o, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path,
-					      0 /* update_cache */, 1 /* update_working_directory */);
 		}
+		update_file(o, mfi.clean, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path);
 	} else if (!o_sha && !a_sha && !b_sha) {
 		/*
 		 * this entry was deleted altogether. a_mode == 0 means
-- 
1.6.2.1