From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] git-send-email.perl: Don't add header "In-Reply-To:" when --no-chain-reply-to set Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:25:15 -0700 Message-ID: <1246469115.28915.21.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> References: <200907010818.57050.markus.heidelberg@web.de> <1246429653.6259.111.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <200907011900.00131.markus.heidelberg@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: markus.heidelberg@web.de X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 01 19:25:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MM3Yo-0003qQ-26 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:25:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754022AbZGARZR (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:25:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754873AbZGARZQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:25:16 -0400 Received: from 136-022.dsl.LABridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:2063 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755309AbZGARZP (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:25:15 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.158] ([192.168.1.158]) by mail.perches.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA30208; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:25:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200907011900.00131.markus.heidelberg@web.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:59 +0200, Markus Heidelberg wrote: > Joe Perches, 01.07.2009: > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 08:18 +0200, Markus Heidelberg wrote: > > > Joe Perches, 01.07.2009: > > > > using > > > > git format-patch --thread=shallow -o > > > > and > > > > git send-email --no-thread --no-chain-reply-to > > > I guess you meant --thread here. > > Actually, I did mean --no-thread. > But --no-thread doesn't duplicate, --thread does. > > According to the last line of your patch, you are using an old version > 1.6.3.1. After this version two threading bugs were fixed, so you may > encounter a wrong behaviour with your old version. Great, I'm glad the bug was fixed already and apologies for the noise, I don't generally track the git list. Reading the archives, I see you're responsible, thanks. cheers, Joe