* [PATCH 2/2] fast-import.c::validate_raw_date(): really validate the value
2009-09-29 6:40 [PATCH 1/2] builtin-mailinfo.c: check error status from rewind and ftruncate Junio C Hamano
@ 2009-09-29 6:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-29 16:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] builtin-mailinfo.c: check error status from rewind and ftruncate Shawn O. Pearce
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2009-09-29 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
When reading the "raw format" timestamp from the input stream, make sure
that the timezone offset is a reasonable value by imitating 7122f82
(date.c: improve guess between timezone offset and year., 2006-06-08).
We _might_ want to also check if the timestamp itself is reasonable, but
that is left for a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
fast-import.c | 9 ++++++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fast-import.c b/fast-import.c
index 7ef9865..6faaaac 100644
--- a/fast-import.c
+++ b/fast-import.c
@@ -1744,10 +1744,12 @@ static int validate_raw_date(const char *src, char *result, int maxlen)
{
const char *orig_src = src;
char *endp;
+ unsigned long num;
errno = 0;
- strtoul(src, &endp, 10);
+ num = strtoul(src, &endp, 10);
+ /* NEEDSWORK: perhaps check for reasonable values? */
if (errno || endp == src || *endp != ' ')
return -1;
@@ -1755,8 +1757,9 @@ static int validate_raw_date(const char *src, char *result, int maxlen)
if (*src != '-' && *src != '+')
return -1;
- strtoul(src + 1, &endp, 10);
- if (errno || endp == src || *endp || (endp - orig_src) >= maxlen)
+ num = strtoul(src + 1, &endp, 10);
+ if (errno || endp == src + 1 || *endp || (endp - orig_src) >= maxlen ||
+ 1400 < num)
return -1;
strcpy(result, orig_src);
--
1.6.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] builtin-mailinfo.c: check error status from rewind and ftruncate
2009-09-29 6:40 [PATCH 1/2] builtin-mailinfo.c: check error status from rewind and ftruncate Junio C Hamano
2009-09-29 6:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] fast-import.c::validate_raw_date(): really validate the value Junio C Hamano
@ 2009-09-29 16:40 ` Shawn O. Pearce
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shawn O. Pearce @ 2009-09-29 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> A recent "cut at scissors" implementation rewinds and truncates the output
> file to store the message when it sees a scissors mark, but it did not
> check if these library calls succeeded.
...
> diff --git a/builtin-mailinfo.c b/builtin-mailinfo.c
> index d498b1c..3306d9e 100644
> --- a/builtin-mailinfo.c
> +++ b/builtin-mailinfo.c
> @@ -785,8 +785,10 @@ static int handle_commit_msg(struct strbuf *line)
>
> if (use_scissors && is_scissors_line(line)) {
> int i;
> - rewind(cmitmsg);
> - ftruncate(fileno(cmitmsg), 0);
> + if (rewind(cmitmsg))
Uh...
builtin-mailinfo.c: In function 'handle_commit_msg':
builtin-mailinfo.c:788: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
I think you mean to squash this in, and use fseek instead:
diff --git a/builtin-mailinfo.c b/builtin-mailinfo.c
index 3306d9e..c90cd31 100644
--- a/builtin-mailinfo.c
+++ b/builtin-mailinfo.c
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static int handle_commit_msg(struct strbuf *line)
if (use_scissors && is_scissors_line(line)) {
int i;
- if (rewind(cmitmsg))
+ if (fseek(cmitmsg, 0L, SEEK_SET))
die_errno("Could not rewind output message file");
if (ftruncate(fileno(cmitmsg), 0))
die_errno("Could not truncate output message file at scissors");
--
Shawn.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread