From: Mark Lodato <lodatom@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Lodato <lodatom@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 03/12] fsck docs: remove outdated and useless diagnostic
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:52:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268455984-19061-4-git-send-email-lodatom@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268455984-19061-1-git-send-email-lodatom@gmail.com>
In git-fsck(1), there was a reference to the warning "<tree> has full
pathnames in it". This exact wording has not been used since 2005
(commit f1f0d0889e55), when the wording was changed slightly. More
importantly, the description of that warning was useless, and there were
many other similar warning messages which were not document at all.
Since all these warnings are fairly obvious, there is no need for them
to be in the man page.
Signed-off-by: Mark Lodato <lodatom@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/git-fsck.txt | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-fsck.txt b/Documentation/git-fsck.txt
index 3ad48a6..86f9b2b 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-fsck.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-fsck.txt
@@ -123,9 +123,6 @@ dangling <type> <object>::
The <type> object <object>, is present in the database but never
'directly' used. A dangling commit could be a root node.
-warning: git-fsck: tree <tree> has full pathnames in it::
- And it shouldn't...
-
sha1 mismatch <object>::
The database has an object who's sha1 doesn't match the
database value.
--
1.7.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-13 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-13 4:52 [PATCH/RFC 00/12] docs: use metavariables consistently Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:52 ` [PATCH/RFC 01/12] commit-tree: allow indirect tree references Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 21:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-16 0:44 ` Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:52 ` [PATCH/RFC 02/12] grep docs: grep accepts a <tree-ish>, not a <tree> Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 21:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-16 0:47 ` Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:52 ` Mark Lodato [this message]
2010-03-13 4:52 ` [PATCH/RFC 04/12] docs: use <sha1> to mean unabbreviated ID Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:52 ` [PATCH/RFC 05/12] docs: differentiate between <tag> and <tagname> Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-13 4:52 ` [PATCH/RFC 06/12] docs: clarify <object>, <commit>, <tree-ish>, etc Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:52 ` [PATCH/RFC 07/12] docs: use <tree> instead of <tree-ish> Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:53 ` [PATCH/RFC 08/12] http-fetch docs: use <commit-id> consistently Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:53 ` [PATCH/RFC 09/12] docs: use <commit> instead of <commit-ish> Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 22:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-16 1:12 ` Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:53 ` [PATCH/RFC 10/12] diff: use brackets for optional args in usage Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:53 ` [PATCH/RFC 11/12] docs: use ... instead of * for multiplicity Mark Lodato
2010-03-13 4:53 ` [PATCH/RFC 12/12] diff docs: remove <rev>{0,2} notation Mark Lodato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268455984-19061-4-git-send-email-lodatom@gmail.com \
--to=lodatom@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).