From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Hourihane Subject: Re: new platform & S_IFGITLINK problem Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 08:21:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1272957697.13488.1319.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> References: <1272756555.13488.1314.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <7vfx2b2ft5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 04 09:21:45 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9CRt-0003bI-D0 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:21:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754390Ab0EDHVk (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 03:21:40 -0400 Received: from fairlite.demon.co.uk ([80.176.228.186]:59369 "EHLO fairlite.demon.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751472Ab0EDHVj (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 03:21:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by fairlite.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D070223F54; Tue, 4 May 2010 07:21:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at demon.co.uk Received: from fairlite.demon.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.demon.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hc7nLqUGCIS4; Tue, 4 May 2010 08:21:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.226] (unknown [192.168.0.226]) by fairlite.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E164221EEA; Tue, 4 May 2010 08:21:37 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 20:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 1 May 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > Yes, that assumption is a gross POSIX violation but we so far haven't seen > > any platform that matters in real life that assigns the IFMT bits > > differently. > > Indeed. Just out of interest - Alan, what _is_ the crazy platform that > doesn't match what absolutely everybody else has always done? You don't want to know :-) But if you really must, it's an Atari platforms running FreeMiNT, but was also essentially Atari's own MultiTOS as well which they adopted from the original MiNT project. Alan.