* [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: Clarify the Signed-off-by rules
@ 2010-07-28 14:12 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-28 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-28 17:23 ` Bert Wesarg
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason @ 2010-07-28 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: Junio C Hamano, Bert Wesarg,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
The wording of the Signed-off-by rules could be read as stating that
S-O-B should only be added when the submitter considered the patch
ready for inclusion in git.git.
We also want Signed-off-by to be used for e.g. RFC patches, in case
someone wants to dig an old patch out of the archive and improve
it. Change the wording to recommend a Signed-off-by for all submitted
patches.
The problem with the wording came up in the "[PATCH/RFC] Hacky version
of a glob() driven config include" thread[1]. Bert Wesarg suggested[2]
that it be removed to avoid confusion, which this change implements.
1. <1273180440-8641-1-git-send-email-avarab@gmail.com>
2. <AANLkTimziTKL13VKIOcaS1TX1F_xvTVjH8Q398Yx36Us@mail.gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 8 +++-----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index 099b238..ece3c77 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -14,11 +14,9 @@ Checklist (and a short version for the impatient):
not "changed" or "changes".
- includes motivation for the change, and contrasts
its implementation with previous behaviour
- - if you want your work included in git.git, add a
- "Signed-off-by: Your Name <you@example.com>" line to the
- commit message (or just use the option "-s" when
- committing) to confirm that you agree to the Developer's
- Certificate of Origin
+ - add a "Signed-off-by: Your Name <you@example.com>" line to the
+ commit message (or just use the option "-s" when committing)
+ to confirm that you agree to the Developer's Certificate of Origin
- make sure that you have tests for the bug you are fixing
- make sure that the test suite passes after your commit
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: Clarify the Signed-off-by rules
2010-07-28 14:12 [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: Clarify the Signed-off-by rules Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
@ 2010-07-28 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-28 17:23 ` Bert Wesarg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2010-07-28 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason; +Cc: git, Bert Wesarg
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
> The wording of the Signed-off-by rules could be read as stating that
> S-O-B should only be added when the submitter considered the patch
> ready for inclusion in git.git.
>
> We also want Signed-off-by to be used for e.g. RFC patches, in case
> someone wants to dig an old patch out of the archive and improve
> it. Change the wording to recommend a Signed-off-by for all submitted
> patches.
Ok. In the past, some people (including Linus) used the lack of sign-off
as a hint to say it is not meant for inclusion, but I always considered it
a bad practice ("RFC" or whatever word next to "PATCH" in bracket would be
far more descriptive). I think this is a good change.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: Clarify the Signed-off-by rules
2010-07-28 14:12 [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: Clarify the Signed-off-by rules Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-28 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2010-07-28 17:23 ` Bert Wesarg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bert Wesarg @ 2010-07-28 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason; +Cc: git, Junio C Hamano
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 16:12, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
> The wording of the Signed-off-by rules could be read as stating that
> S-O-B should only be added when the submitter considered the patch
> ready for inclusion in git.git.
>
> We also want Signed-off-by to be used for e.g. RFC patches, in case
> someone wants to dig an old patch out of the archive and improve
> it. Change the wording to recommend a Signed-off-by for all submitted
> patches.
>
> The problem with the wording came up in the "[PATCH/RFC] Hacky version
> of a glob() driven config include" thread[1]. Bert Wesarg suggested[2]
> that it be removed to avoid confusion, which this change implements.
>
Thanks for resurrecting this.
Acked-by: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
> 1. <1273180440-8641-1-git-send-email-avarab@gmail.com>
> 2. <AANLkTimziTKL13VKIOcaS1TX1F_xvTVjH8Q398Yx36Us@mail.gmail.com>
>
> Suggested-by: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 8 +++-----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> index 099b238..ece3c77 100644
> --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> @@ -14,11 +14,9 @@ Checklist (and a short version for the impatient):
> not "changed" or "changes".
> - includes motivation for the change, and contrasts
> its implementation with previous behaviour
> - - if you want your work included in git.git, add a
> - "Signed-off-by: Your Name <you@example.com>" line to the
> - commit message (or just use the option "-s" when
> - committing) to confirm that you agree to the Developer's
> - Certificate of Origin
> + - add a "Signed-off-by: Your Name <you@example.com>" line to the
> + commit message (or just use the option "-s" when committing)
> + to confirm that you agree to the Developer's Certificate of Origin
> - make sure that you have tests for the bug you are fixing
> - make sure that the test suite passes after your commit
>
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-28 17:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-28 14:12 [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: Clarify the Signed-off-by rules Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-28 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-28 17:23 ` Bert Wesarg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).