From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] merge-recursive: Avoid excessive output for and reprocessing of renames
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 06:55:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282308940-3527-1-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com> (raw)
In 5a2580d (merge_recursive: Fix renames across paths below D/F conflicts
2010-07-09) and ae74548 (merge-recursive: Fix multiple file rename across
D/F conflict 2010-08-17), renames across D/F conflicts were fixed by
making process_renames() consider as unprocessed renames whose dst_entry
"still" had higher stage entries. The assumption was that those higher
stage entries would have been cleared out of dst_entry by that point in
cases where the conflict could be resolved (normal renames with no D/F
conflicts). That is not the case -- higher stage entries will remain in
all cases.
Fix this by checking for higher stage entries corresponding to D/F
conflicts, namely that stages 2 and 3 have exactly one nonzero mode between
them. The nonzero mode stage corresponds to a file at the path, while the
stage with a zero mode will correspond to a directory at that path (since
rename/delete conflicts will have already been handled before this codepath
is reached.)
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
What a mess, sorry for flubbing up the D/F series so badly and the need
for so many fixups after it already hit next. I hope this finally fixes
things and that there's no more embarrasing bugs (or even
non-embarrasing ones). Also, it looks like Alex was right about this
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/149948), though
I just didn't quite understand him at the time.
merge-recursive.c | 8 ++------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index a3fc443..aadd48c 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -1020,7 +1020,6 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
if (mfi.clean &&
sha_eq(mfi.sha, ren1->pair->two->sha1) &&
mfi.mode == ren1->pair->two->mode) {
- int i;
/*
* This message is part of
* t6022 test. If you change
@@ -1032,12 +1031,9 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
* in the index (e.g. due to a D/F
* conflict) that need to be resolved.
*/
- for (i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
- if (!ren1->dst_entry->stages[i].mode)
- continue;
+ if (!ren1->dst_entry->stages[2].mode !=
+ !ren1->dst_entry->stages[3].mode)
ren1->dst_entry->processed = 0;
- break;
- }
} else {
if (mfi.merge || !mfi.clean)
output(o, 1, "Renaming %s => %s", ren1_src, ren1_dst);
--
1.7.2.1.365.gf72e17
reply other threads:[~2010-08-20 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282308940-3527-1-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).