From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] Fix ignoring of pathspecs with rev-list --objects
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:53:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282704795-29661-3-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282704795-29661-1-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com>
When traversing commits, the selection of commits would heed the list of
pathspecs passed, but subsequent walking of the trees of those commits
would not. This resulted in 'rev-list --objects HEAD -- <paths>'
displaying objects at unwanted paths.
Have process_tree() call tree_entry_interesting() to determine which paths
are interesting and should be walked.
Naturally, this change can provide a large speedup when paths are specified
together with --objects, since many tree entries are now correctly ignored.
Interestingly, though, this change also gives me a small (~1%) but
repeatable speedup even when no paths are specified with --objects.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
diff.h | 1 +
list-objects.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh | 2 +-
tree-diff.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/diff.h b/diff.h
index 6fff024..35130b8 100644
--- a/diff.h
+++ b/diff.h
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ extern int diff_tree_sha1(const unsigned char *old, const unsigned char *new,
const char *base, struct diff_options *opt);
extern int diff_root_tree_sha1(const unsigned char *new, const char *base,
struct diff_options *opt);
+extern int tree_entry_interesting(struct tree_desc *desc, const char *base, int baselen, struct diff_options *opt);
struct combine_diff_path {
struct combine_diff_path *next;
diff --git a/list-objects.c b/list-objects.c
index 8953548..daa50bf 100644
--- a/list-objects.c
+++ b/list-objects.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void process_tree(struct rev_info *revs,
struct tree_desc desc;
struct name_entry entry;
struct name_path me;
+ int all_interesting = (revs->diffopt.nr_paths == 0);
if (!revs->tree_objects)
return;
@@ -84,7 +85,24 @@ static void process_tree(struct rev_info *revs,
init_tree_desc(&desc, tree->buffer, tree->size);
- while (tree_entry(&desc, &entry)) {
+ for (; desc.size; update_tree_entry(&desc)) {
+ entry = desc.entry;
+
+ if (!all_interesting) {
+ char *full_path = path_name(path, name);
+ int full_path_len = strlen(full_path);
+ int showit = tree_entry_interesting(&desc, full_path, full_path_len,
+ &revs->diffopt);
+ free(full_path);
+
+ if (showit < 0)
+ break;
+ else if (!showit)
+ continue;
+ else if (showit == 2)
+ all_interesting = 1;
+ }
+
if (S_ISDIR(entry.mode))
process_tree(revs,
lookup_tree(entry.sha1),
diff --git a/t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh b/t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh
index 2c403ac..1bc395c 100755
--- a/t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh
+++ b/t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ test_expect_success setup '
git commit -mone
'
-test_expect_failure 'rev-list --objects heeds pathspecs' '
+test_expect_success 'rev-list --objects heeds pathspecs' '
git rev-list --objects HEAD -- wanted_file >output &&
grep wanted_file output &&
diff --git a/tree-diff.c b/tree-diff.c
index cd659c6..2fb670b 100644
--- a/tree-diff.c
+++ b/tree-diff.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int compare_tree_entry(struct tree_desc *t1, struct tree_desc *t2, const
* - zero for no
* - negative for "no, and no subsequent entries will be either"
*/
-static int tree_entry_interesting(struct tree_desc *desc, const char *base, int baselen, struct diff_options *opt)
+int tree_entry_interesting(struct tree_desc *desc, const char *base, int baselen, struct diff_options *opt)
{
const char *path;
const unsigned char *sha1;
--
1.7.2.2.39.gf7e23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-25 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-25 2:53 [PATCH 0/7] Minor bug fix and optimizations for revision/tree walking Elijah Newren
2010-08-25 2:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] Add testcase showing how pathspecs are ignored with rev-list --objects Elijah Newren
2010-08-25 2:53 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2010-08-25 22:11 ` [PATCH 2/7] Fix ignoring of pathspecs " Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-08-25 23:50 ` Elijah Newren
2010-08-26 2:49 ` Elijah Newren
2010-08-26 23:15 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-08-26 23:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-25 2:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] tree-walk: Correct bitrotted comment about tree_entry() Elijah Newren
2010-08-25 2:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] tree_entry_interesting(): Make return value more specific Elijah Newren
2010-08-25 2:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] diff_tree(): Skip skip_uninteresting() when all remaining paths interesting Elijah Newren
2010-08-25 23:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-25 23:57 ` Elijah Newren
2010-08-26 3:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-25 2:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] list-objects.c: Avoid recomputing interesting-ness for subtrees when possible Elijah Newren
2010-08-25 2:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] tree-diff.c: " Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282704795-29661-3-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).