git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Schalk, Ken" <ken.schalk@intel.com>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/37] t3030: Add a testcase for resolvable rename/add conflict with symlinks
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:28:34 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284971350-30590-2-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284971350-30590-1-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com>

From: Schalk, Ken <ken.schalk@intel.com>

d5af510 (RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical
2010-09-01) avoided erroring out in a rename/add conflict when the contents
were identical.  A simpler fix could have handled that particular testcase,
but it would not correctly handle the case where a symlink is involved.
Add another testcase using symlinks, to avoid breaking that case.

Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
 t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh b/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
index e66e550..3935c4b 100755
--- a/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
+++ b/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup 1' '
 	git branch submod &&
 	git branch copy &&
 	git branch rename &&
+	if test_have_prereq SYMLINKS
+	then
+		git branch rename-ln
+	fi &&
 
 	echo hello >>a &&
 	cp a d/e &&
@@ -255,7 +259,16 @@ test_expect_success 'setup 8' '
 	git mv a e &&
 	git add e &&
 	test_tick &&
-	git commit -m "rename a->e"
+	git commit -m "rename a->e" &&
+	if test_have_prereq SYMLINKS
+	then
+		git checkout rename-ln &&
+		git mv a e &&
+		ln -s e a &&
+		git add a e &&
+		test_tick &&
+		git commit -m "rename a->e, symlink a->e"
+	fi
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'setup 9' '
@@ -615,4 +628,26 @@ test_expect_success 'merge-recursive copy vs. rename' '
 	test_cmp expected actual
 '
 
+if test_have_prereq SYMLINKS
+then
+	test_expect_success 'merge-recursive rename vs. rename/symlink' '
+
+		git checkout -f rename &&
+		git merge rename-ln &&
+		( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
+		(
+			echo "100644 blob $o0	b"
+			echo "100644 blob $o0	c"
+			echo "100644 blob $o0	d/e"
+			echo "100644 blob $o0	e"
+			echo "100644 $o0 0	b"
+			echo "100644 $o0 0	c"
+			echo "100644 $o0 0	d/e"
+			echo "100644 $o0 0	e"
+		) >expected &&
+		test_cmp expected actual
+	'
+fi
+
+
 test_done
-- 
1.7.3.271.g16009

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-20  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-20  8:28 [PATCH 00/37] Audit and fix corner case bugs in recursive merge Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2010-09-20  9:15   ` [PATCH 01/37] t3030: Add a testcase for resolvable rename/add conflict with symlinks Johannes Sixt
2010-09-20  9:34   ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 02/37] merge-recursive: Restructure showing how to chain more process_* functions Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 03/37] t6032: Add a test checking for excessive output from merge Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 04/37] t6022: Add test combinations of {content conflict?, D/F conflict remains?} Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 05/37] t6022: Add tests for reversing order of merges when D/F conflicts present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 06/37] t6022: Add tests with both rename source & dest involved in D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 07/37] t6022: Add paired rename+D/F conflict: (two/file, one/file) -> (one, two) Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 08/37] t6022: Add tests for rename/rename combined with D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 09/37] t6020: Modernize style a bit Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  9:24   ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-20 16:03     ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-22  1:44       ` Junio C Hamano
2010-09-22  4:41         ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 10/37] t6020: Add a testcase for modify/delete + directory/file conflict Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 11/37] t6036: Test index and worktree state, not just that merge fails Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 12/37] t6036: Add a second testcase similar to the first but with content changes Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 13/37] t6036: Add testcase for undetected conflict Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 14/37] merge-recursive: Small code clarification -- variable name and comments Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 15/37] merge-recursive: Rename conflict_rename_rename*() for clarity Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 16/37] merge-recursive: Nuke rename/directory conflict detection Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 17/37] merge-recursive: Move rename/delete handling into dedicated function Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 18/37] merge-recursive: Move delete/modify " Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 19/37] merge-recursive: Move process_entry's content merging into a function Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 20/37] merge-recursive: New data structures for deferring of D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 21/37] merge-recursive: New function to assist resolving renames in-core only Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 22/37] merge-recursive: Have process_entry() skip D/F or rename entries Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 23/37] merge-recursive: Structure process_df_entry() to handle more cases Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 24/37] merge-recursive: Update conflict_rename_rename_1to2() call signature Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 25/37] merge-recursive: Update merge_content() " Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:28 ` [PATCH 26/37] merge-recursive: Avoid doubly merging rename/add conflict contents Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 27/37] merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to two Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 28/37] merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to other file Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 29/37] merge-recursive: Delay handling of rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 30/37] merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renames Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 31/37] merge-recursive: Delay modify/delete conflicts if D/F conflict present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 32/37] conflict_rename_delete(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 33/37] conflict_rename_rename_1to2(): Fix checks for presence of D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 34/37] merge_content(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 35/37] handle_delete_modify(): " Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 36/37] merge-recursive: Make room for directories in D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 11:40   ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-20 16:06     ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-20  8:29 ` [PATCH 37/37] merge-recursive: Remove redundant path clearing for " Elijah Newren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1284971350-30590-2-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com \
    --to=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ken.schalk@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).