From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/37] t6032: Add a test checking for excessive output from merge
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:28:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284971350-30590-4-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284971350-30590-1-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com>
Previous D/F fixes I submitted (5a2580d and ae74548) had caused merge to
become excessively spammy, which was fixed in 96ecac6 (merge-recursive:
Avoid excessive output for and reprocessing of renames 2010-08-20). Add a
new test to avoid repeating that mistake with my several upcoming changes.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
t/t6032-merge-large-rename.sh | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t6032-merge-large-rename.sh b/t/t6032-merge-large-rename.sh
index eac5eba..fdb6c25 100755
--- a/t/t6032-merge-large-rename.sh
+++ b/t/t6032-merge-large-rename.sh
@@ -70,4 +70,34 @@ test_expect_success 'set merge.renamelimit to 5' '
test_rename 5 ok
test_rename 6 fail
+test_expect_success 'setup large simple rename' '
+ git config --unset merge.renamelimit &&
+ git config --unset diff.renamelimit &&
+
+ git reset --hard initial &&
+ for i in $(count 200); do
+ make_text foo bar baz >$i
+ done &&
+ git add . &&
+ git commit -m create-files &&
+
+ git branch simple-change &&
+ git checkout -b simple-rename &&
+
+ mkdir builtin &&
+ git mv [0-9]* builtin/ &&
+ git commit -m renamed &&
+
+ git checkout simple-change &&
+ >unrelated-change &&
+ git add unrelated-change &&
+ git commit -m unrelated-change
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'massive simple rename does not spam added files' '
+ unset GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY &&
+ git merge --no-stat simple-rename | grep -v Removing >output &&
+ test 5 -gt "$(wc -l < output)"
+'
+
test_done
--
1.7.3.271.g16009
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-20 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-20 8:28 [PATCH 00/37] Audit and fix corner case bugs in recursive merge Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 01/37] t3030: Add a testcase for resolvable rename/add conflict with symlinks Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 9:15 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-20 9:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 02/37] merge-recursive: Restructure showing how to chain more process_* functions Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 04/37] t6022: Add test combinations of {content conflict?, D/F conflict remains?} Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 05/37] t6022: Add tests for reversing order of merges when D/F conflicts present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 06/37] t6022: Add tests with both rename source & dest involved in D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 07/37] t6022: Add paired rename+D/F conflict: (two/file, one/file) -> (one, two) Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 08/37] t6022: Add tests for rename/rename combined with D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 09/37] t6020: Modernize style a bit Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 9:24 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-20 16:03 ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-22 1:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-09-22 4:41 ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 10/37] t6020: Add a testcase for modify/delete + directory/file conflict Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 11/37] t6036: Test index and worktree state, not just that merge fails Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 12/37] t6036: Add a second testcase similar to the first but with content changes Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 13/37] t6036: Add testcase for undetected conflict Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 14/37] merge-recursive: Small code clarification -- variable name and comments Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 15/37] merge-recursive: Rename conflict_rename_rename*() for clarity Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 16/37] merge-recursive: Nuke rename/directory conflict detection Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 17/37] merge-recursive: Move rename/delete handling into dedicated function Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 18/37] merge-recursive: Move delete/modify " Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 19/37] merge-recursive: Move process_entry's content merging into a function Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 20/37] merge-recursive: New data structures for deferring of D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 21/37] merge-recursive: New function to assist resolving renames in-core only Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 22/37] merge-recursive: Have process_entry() skip D/F or rename entries Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 23/37] merge-recursive: Structure process_df_entry() to handle more cases Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 24/37] merge-recursive: Update conflict_rename_rename_1to2() call signature Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 25/37] merge-recursive: Update merge_content() " Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 26/37] merge-recursive: Avoid doubly merging rename/add conflict contents Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 27/37] merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to two Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 28/37] merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to other file Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 29/37] merge-recursive: Delay handling of rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 30/37] merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renames Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 31/37] merge-recursive: Delay modify/delete conflicts if D/F conflict present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 32/37] conflict_rename_delete(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 33/37] conflict_rename_rename_1to2(): Fix checks for presence of D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 34/37] merge_content(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 35/37] handle_delete_modify(): " Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 36/37] merge-recursive: Make room for directories in D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 11:40 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-20 16:06 ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 37/37] merge-recursive: Remove redundant path clearing for " Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1284971350-30590-4-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).