From: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
To: robbat2@gentoo.org, casey@nrlssc.navy.mil, git@vger.kernel.org,
brian@gernhardtsoftware.com
Cc: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH/RFC v2 1/4] rev-parse: stop interpreting flags as options to rev-parse once --flags is specified
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:04:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285405454-12521-3-git-send-email-jon.seymour@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285405454-12521-1-git-send-email-jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Current git rev-parse behaviour makes --flags hard to use if the remaining
arguments to git rev-parse contain an option that would otherwise be interpreted
as an option by git rev-parse itself.
So, for example:
$> git rev-parse --flags -q -X
-X
Normally one might expect to use -- to prevent -q being interpreted:
$> git rev-parse --flags -- -q -X
-q -X
But we can't really use -- in this way, because commands that use
git rev-parse might reasonably expect:
$> git rev-parse --flags -Y -- -q -X
-Y
That is, -Y to be regarded as a flag but everything after -- to be uninterpreted.
This proposed change modifies git rev-parse so that git rev-parse stops
interpreting flag arguments as options to git rev-parse once --flags is
interpreted. We also exit early once -- is found.
Tests will follow in subsequent iterations of this patch, if the consensus
is that the approach is correct.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
---
builtin/rev-parse.c | 7 +++++++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/rev-parse.c b/builtin/rev-parse.c
index a5a1c86..9e340c7 100644
--- a/builtin/rev-parse.c
+++ b/builtin/rev-parse.c
@@ -497,8 +497,15 @@ int cmd_rev_parse(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
/* Pass on the "--" if we show anything but files.. */
if (filter & (DO_FLAGS | DO_REVS))
show_file(arg);
+ if (!(filter & DO_NONFLAGS)) {
+ return 0;
+ }
continue;
}
+ if (!(filter & DO_NONFLAGS)) {
+ show_flag(arg);
+ continue;
+ }
if (!strcmp(arg, "--default")) {
def = argv[i+1];
i++;
--
1.7.3.1.gc81ce.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-25 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-25 9:04 [PATCH/RFC v2 0/4] rev-parse: allow --flags to output rev-parse-like flags Jon Seymour
2010-09-25 9:04 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 0/4] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Jon Seymour
2010-09-25 9:04 ` Jon Seymour [this message]
2010-09-25 9:04 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 2/4] rev-parse: Don't recognise --flags as an option if --no-flags has been specified Jon Seymour
2010-09-25 10:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-25 9:04 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 3/4] rev-parse: add tests for git rev-parse --flags Jon Seymour
2010-09-25 10:29 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-25 9:04 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 4/4] rev-parse: update documentation of --flags and --no-flags options Jon Seymour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285405454-12521-3-git-send-email-jon.seymour@gmail.com \
--to=jon.seymour@gmail.com \
--cc=brian@gernhardtsoftware.com \
--cc=casey@nrlssc.navy.mil \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robbat2@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).