From: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: johan@herland.net, jrnieder@gmail.com, bebarino@gmail.com,
gitster@pobox.com
Subject: [PATCH 18/18] git notes merge: Add testcases for merging notes trees at different fanouts
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:23:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285719811-10871-19-git-send-email-johan@herland.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285719811-10871-1-git-send-email-johan@herland.net>
Notes trees may exist at different fanout levels internally. This
implementation detail should not be visible to the user, and it should
certainly not affect the merging of notes tree.
This patch adds testcases verifying the correctness of 'git notes merge'
when merging notes trees at different fanout levels.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
---
t/t3311-notes-merge-fanout.sh | 436 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 436 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t3311-notes-merge-fanout.sh
diff --git a/t/t3311-notes-merge-fanout.sh b/t/t3311-notes-merge-fanout.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..d1c7b69
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t3311-notes-merge-fanout.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,436 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# Copyright (c) 2010 Johan Herland
+#
+
+test_description='Test notes merging at various fanout levels'
+
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+verify_notes () {
+ notes_ref="$1"
+ commit="$2"
+ if test -f "expect_notes_$notes_ref"
+ then
+ git -c core.notesRef="refs/notes/$notes_ref" notes |
+ sort >"output_notes_$notes_ref" &&
+ test_cmp "expect_notes_$notes_ref" "output_notes_$notes_ref" ||
+ return 1
+ fi &&
+ git -c core.notesRef="refs/notes/$notes_ref" log --format="%H %s%n%N" \
+ "$commit" >"output_log_$notes_ref" &&
+ test_cmp "expect_log_$notes_ref" "output_log_$notes_ref"
+}
+
+verify_fanout () {
+ notes_ref="$1"
+ # Expect entire notes tree to have a fanout == 1
+ git rev-parse --quiet --verify "refs/notes/$notes_ref" >/dev/null &&
+ git ls-tree -r --name-only "refs/notes/$notes_ref" |
+ while read path
+ do
+ case "$path" in
+ ??/??????????????????????????????????????)
+ : true
+ ;;
+ *)
+ echo "Invalid path \"$path\"" &&
+ return 1
+ ;;
+ esac
+ done
+}
+
+verify_no_fanout () {
+ notes_ref="$1"
+ # Expect entire notes tree to have a fanout == 0
+ git rev-parse --quiet --verify "refs/notes/$notes_ref" >/dev/null &&
+ git ls-tree -r --name-only "refs/notes/$notes_ref" |
+ while read path
+ do
+ case "$path" in
+ ????????????????????????????????????????)
+ : true
+ ;;
+ *)
+ echo "Invalid path \"$path\"" &&
+ return 1
+ ;;
+ esac
+ done
+}
+
+# Set up a notes merge scenario with different kinds of conflicts
+test_expect_success 'setup a few initial commits with notes (notes ref: x)' '
+ git config core.notesRef refs/notes/x &&
+ for i in 1 2 3 4 5
+ do
+ test_commit "commit$i" >/dev/null &&
+ git notes add -m "notes for commit$i" || return 1
+ done
+'
+
+commit_sha1=$(git rev-parse commit1^{commit})
+commit_sha2=$(git rev-parse commit2^{commit})
+commit_sha3=$(git rev-parse commit3^{commit})
+commit_sha4=$(git rev-parse commit4^{commit})
+commit_sha5=$(git rev-parse commit5^{commit})
+
+cat <<EOF | sort >expect_notes_x
+aed91155c7a72c2188e781fdf40e0f3761b299db $commit_sha5
+99fab268f9d7ee7b011e091a436c78def8eeee69 $commit_sha4
+953c20ae26c7aa0b428c20693fe38bc687f9d1a9 $commit_sha3
+6358796131b8916eaa2dde6902642942a1cb37e1 $commit_sha2
+b02d459c32f0e68f2fe0981033bb34f38776ba47 $commit_sha1
+EOF
+
+cat >expect_log_x <<EOF
+$commit_sha5 commit5
+notes for commit5
+
+$commit_sha4 commit4
+notes for commit4
+
+$commit_sha3 commit3
+notes for commit3
+
+$commit_sha2 commit2
+notes for commit2
+
+$commit_sha1 commit1
+notes for commit1
+
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'sanity check (x)' '
+ verify_notes x commit5 &&
+ verify_no_fanout x
+'
+
+num=300
+
+cp expect_log_x expect_log_y
+
+test_expect_success 'Add a few hundred commits w/notes to trigger fanout (x -> y)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/y refs/notes/x &&
+ git config core.notesRef refs/notes/y &&
+ i=5 &&
+ while test $i -lt $num
+ do
+ i=$(($i + 1)) &&
+ test_commit "commit$i" >/dev/null &&
+ git notes add -m "notes for commit$i" || return 1
+ done &&
+ test "$(git rev-parse refs/notes/y)" != "$(git rev-parse refs/notes/x)" &&
+ # Expected number of commits and notes
+ test "$(git rev-list HEAD | wc -l)" = "$num" &&
+ test "$(git notes list | wc -l)" = "$num" &&
+ # 5 first notes unchanged
+ verify_notes y commit5
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'notes tree has fanout (y)' 'verify_fanout y'
+
+test_expect_success 'No-op merge (already included) (x => y)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/m refs/notes/y &&
+ git config core.notesRef refs/notes/m &&
+ git notes merge x &&
+ test "$(git rev-parse refs/notes/m)" = "$(git rev-parse refs/notes/y)"
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'Fast-forward merge (y => x)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/m refs/notes/x &&
+ git notes merge y &&
+ test "$(git rev-parse refs/notes/m)" = "$(git rev-parse refs/notes/y)"
+'
+
+cat <<EOF | sort >expect_notes_z
+9f506ee70e20379d7f78204c77b334f43d77410d $commit_sha3
+23a47d6ea7d589895faf800752054818e1e7627b $commit_sha2
+b02d459c32f0e68f2fe0981033bb34f38776ba47 $commit_sha1
+EOF
+
+cat >expect_log_z <<EOF
+$commit_sha5 commit5
+
+$commit_sha4 commit4
+
+$commit_sha3 commit3
+notes for commit3
+
+appended notes for commit3
+
+$commit_sha2 commit2
+new notes for commit2
+
+$commit_sha1 commit1
+notes for commit1
+
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'change some of the initial 5 notes (x -> z)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/z refs/notes/x &&
+ git config core.notesRef refs/notes/z &&
+ git notes add -f -m "new notes for commit2" commit2 &&
+ git notes append -m "appended notes for commit3" commit3 &&
+ git notes remove commit4 &&
+ git notes remove commit5 &&
+ verify_notes z commit5
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'notes tree has no fanout (z)' 'verify_no_fanout z'
+
+cp expect_log_z expect_log_m
+
+test_expect_success 'successful merge without conflicts (y => z)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/m refs/notes/z &&
+ git config core.notesRef refs/notes/m &&
+ git notes merge y &&
+ verify_notes m commit5 &&
+ # x/y/z unchanged
+ verify_notes x commit5 &&
+ verify_notes y commit5 &&
+ verify_notes z commit5
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'notes tree still has fanout after merge (m)' 'verify_fanout m'
+
+cat >expect_log_w <<EOF
+$commit_sha5 commit5
+
+$commit_sha4 commit4
+other notes for commit4
+
+$commit_sha3 commit3
+other notes for commit3
+
+$commit_sha2 commit2
+notes for commit2
+
+$commit_sha1 commit1
+other notes for commit1
+
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'introduce conflicting changes (y -> w)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/w refs/notes/y &&
+ git config core.notesRef refs/notes/w &&
+ git notes add -f -m "other notes for commit1" commit1 &&
+ git notes add -f -m "other notes for commit3" commit3 &&
+ git notes add -f -m "other notes for commit4" commit4 &&
+ git notes remove commit5 &&
+ verify_notes w commit5
+'
+
+cat >expect_log_m <<EOF
+$commit_sha5 commit5
+
+$commit_sha4 commit4
+other notes for commit4
+
+$commit_sha3 commit3
+other notes for commit3
+
+$commit_sha2 commit2
+new notes for commit2
+
+$commit_sha1 commit1
+other notes for commit1
+
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'successful merge using "ours" strategy (z => w)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/m refs/notes/w &&
+ git config core.notesRef refs/notes/m &&
+ git notes merge -s ours z &&
+ verify_notes m commit5 &&
+ # w/x/y/z unchanged
+ verify_notes w commit5 &&
+ verify_notes x commit5 &&
+ verify_notes y commit5 &&
+ verify_notes z commit5
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'notes tree still has fanout after merge (m)' 'verify_fanout m'
+
+cat >expect_log_m <<EOF
+$commit_sha5 commit5
+
+$commit_sha4 commit4
+
+$commit_sha3 commit3
+notes for commit3
+
+appended notes for commit3
+
+$commit_sha2 commit2
+new notes for commit2
+
+$commit_sha1 commit1
+other notes for commit1
+
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'successful merge using "theirs" strategy (z => w)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/m refs/notes/w &&
+ git notes merge -s theirs z &&
+ verify_notes m commit5 &&
+ # w/x/y/z unchanged
+ verify_notes w commit5 &&
+ verify_notes x commit5 &&
+ verify_notes y commit5 &&
+ verify_notes z commit5
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'notes tree still has fanout after merge (m)' 'verify_fanout m'
+
+cat >expect_log_m <<EOF
+$commit_sha5 commit5
+
+$commit_sha4 commit4
+other notes for commit4
+
+$commit_sha3 commit3
+other notes for commit3
+
+notes for commit3
+
+appended notes for commit3
+
+$commit_sha2 commit2
+new notes for commit2
+
+$commit_sha1 commit1
+other notes for commit1
+
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'successful merge using "union" strategy (z => w)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/m refs/notes/w &&
+ git notes merge -s union z &&
+ verify_notes m commit5 &&
+ # w/x/y/z unchanged
+ verify_notes w commit5 &&
+ verify_notes x commit5 &&
+ verify_notes y commit5 &&
+ verify_notes z commit5
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'notes tree still has fanout after merge (m)' 'verify_fanout m'
+
+cat >expect_log_m <<EOF
+$commit_sha5 commit5
+
+$commit_sha4 commit4
+other notes for commit4
+
+$commit_sha3 commit3
+appended notes for commit3
+notes for commit3
+other notes for commit3
+
+$commit_sha2 commit2
+new notes for commit2
+
+$commit_sha1 commit1
+other notes for commit1
+
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'successful merge using "cat_sort_uniq" strategy (z => w)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/m refs/notes/w &&
+ git notes merge -s cat_sort_uniq z &&
+ verify_notes m commit5 &&
+ # w/x/y/z unchanged
+ verify_notes w commit5 &&
+ verify_notes x commit5 &&
+ verify_notes y commit5 &&
+ verify_notes z commit5
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'notes tree still has fanout after merge (m)' 'verify_fanout m'
+
+# We're merging z into w. Here are the conflicts we expect:
+#
+# commit | x -> w | x -> z | conflict?
+# -------|-----------|-----------|----------
+# 1 | changed | unchanged | no, use w
+# 2 | unchanged | changed | no, use z
+# 3 | changed | changed | yes (w, then z in conflict markers)
+# 4 | changed | deleted | yes (w)
+# 5 | deleted | deleted | no, deleted
+
+test_expect_success 'fails to merge using "manual" strategy (z => w)' '
+ git update-ref refs/notes/m refs/notes/w &&
+ test_must_fail git notes merge z
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'notes tree still has fanout after merge (m)' 'verify_fanout m'
+
+cat <<EOF | sort >expect_conflicts
+$commit_sha3
+$commit_sha4
+EOF
+
+cat >expect_conflict_$commit_sha3 <<EOF
+<<<<<<< refs/notes/m
+other notes for commit3
+=======
+notes for commit3
+
+appended notes for commit3
+>>>>>>> refs/notes/z
+EOF
+
+cat >expect_conflict_$commit_sha4 <<EOF
+other notes for commit4
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'verify conflict entries (with no fanout)' '
+ ls .git/NOTES_MERGE_WORKTREE >output_conflicts &&
+ test_cmp expect_conflicts output_conflicts &&
+ ( for f in $(cat expect_conflicts); do
+ test_cmp "expect_conflict_$f" ".git/NOTES_MERGE_WORKTREE/$f" ||
+ exit 1
+ done ) &&
+ # Verify that current notes tree (pre-merge) has not changed (m == w)
+ test "$(git rev-parse refs/notes/m)" = "$(git rev-parse refs/notes/w)"
+'
+
+cat >expect_log_m <<EOF
+$commit_sha5 commit5
+
+$commit_sha4 commit4
+other notes for commit4
+
+$commit_sha3 commit3
+other notes for commit3
+
+appended notes for commit3
+
+$commit_sha2 commit2
+new notes for commit2
+
+$commit_sha1 commit1
+other notes for commit1
+
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'resolve and finalize merge (z => w)' '
+ cat >.git/NOTES_MERGE_WORKTREE/$commit_sha3 <<EOF &&
+other notes for commit3
+
+appended notes for commit3
+EOF
+ git notes merge --commit &&
+ verify_notes m commit5 &&
+ # w/x/y/z unchanged
+ verify_notes w commit5 &&
+ verify_notes x commit5 &&
+ verify_notes y commit5 &&
+ verify_notes z commit5
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'notes tree still has fanout after merge (m)' 'verify_fanout m'
+
+test_done
--
1.7.3.98.g5ad7d9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-29 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-29 0:23 [PATCH 00/18] git notes merge Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 01/18] (trivial) notes.h: Minor documentation fixes to copy_notes() Johan Herland
2010-10-05 14:55 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-05 15:22 ` Johan Herland
2010-10-05 15:26 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 02/18] notes.h: Make default_notes_ref() available in notes API Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 03/18] notes.h/c: Clarify the handling of notes objects that are == null_sha1 Johan Herland
2010-10-05 15:21 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-05 22:30 ` Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 04/18] notes.h/c: Propagate combine_notes_fn return value to add_note() and beyond Johan Herland
2010-10-05 15:38 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-06 19:40 ` Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 05/18] (trivial) t3303: Indent with tabs instead of spaces for consistency Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 06/18] notes.c: Use two newlines (instead of one) when concatenating notes Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 07/18] builtin/notes.c: Split notes ref DWIMmery into a separate function Johan Herland
2010-10-05 15:50 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-07 13:56 ` Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 08/18] git notes merge: Initial implementation handling trivial merges only Johan Herland
2010-10-07 4:37 ` Test script style (Re: [PATCH 08/18] git notes merge: Initial implementation handling trivial merges only) Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-07 4:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-10-07 6:24 ` [PATCH 08/18] git notes merge: Initial implementation handling trivial merges only Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-08 23:55 ` Johan Herland
2010-10-09 17:29 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-21 2:12 ` Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 09/18] builtin/notes.c: Refactor creation of notes commits Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 10/18] git notes merge: Handle real, non-conflicting notes merges Johan Herland
2010-09-29 16:20 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-29 23:25 ` Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 11/18] git notes merge: Add automatic conflict resolvers (ours, theirs, union) Johan Herland
2010-10-02 9:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-04 15:10 ` Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 12/18] Documentation: Preliminary docs on 'git notes merge' Johan Herland
2010-10-02 8:55 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-04 15:15 ` Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 13/18] git notes merge: Manual conflict resolution, part 1/2 Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 14/18] git notes merge: Manual conflict resolution, part 2/2 Johan Herland
2010-09-29 16:19 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-29 23:37 ` Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 15/18] git notes merge: List conflicting notes in notes merge commit message Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 16/18] git notes merge: --commit should fail if underlying notes ref has moved Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` [PATCH 17/18] git notes merge: Add another auto-resolving strategy: "cat_sort_uniq" Johan Herland
2010-09-29 0:23 ` Johan Herland [this message]
2010-09-29 14:56 ` [PATCH 00/18] git notes merge Sverre Rabbelier
2010-09-29 15:16 ` Johan Herland
2010-09-29 15:20 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-09-29 16:04 ` Johan Herland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285719811-10871-19-git-send-email-johan@herland.net \
--to=johan@herland.net \
--cc=bebarino@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).