From: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 17/20] rebase: improve detection of rebase in progress
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:58:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290715083-16919-18-git-send-email-martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290715083-16919-1-git-send-email-martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Detect early on if a rebase is in progress and what kind of rebase it
is. This prepares for further refactoring where plain (am) rebase will
be dispatched to git-rebase--am.sh and merge rebase will be dispatched
to git-rebase--merge.sh.
The idea is to use the same variables whether the type of rebase was
detected from rebase-apply/ or rebase-merge/ directories or from on
the command line options.
Also show a consistent error message independent of the kind of rebase
that was in progress. Also remove the obsolete wording about an being
in the middle of a 'patch application', since that (an existing
"$GIT_DIR"/rebase-apply/applying) aborts 'git rebase' at an earlier
stage.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
---
git-rebase.sh | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
index 43cab41..d233da6 100755
--- a/git-rebase.sh
+++ b/git-rebase.sh
@@ -59,16 +59,19 @@ action=
preserve_merges=
autosquash=
test "$(git config --bool rebase.autosquash)" = "true" && autosquash=t
+# Non-empty if a rebase was in progress when 'git rebase' was invoked
+in_progress=
+# One of {am, merge, interactive}
+type=
+# One of {"$GIT_DIR"/rebase-apply, "$GIT_DIR"/rebase-merge}
+state_dir=
read_state () {
- if test -d "$merge_dir"
+ if test "$type" = merge
then
- state_dir="$merge_dir"
onto_name=$(cat "$merge_dir"/onto_name) &&
end=$(cat "$merge_dir"/end) &&
msgnum=$(cat "$merge_dir"/msgnum)
- else
- state_dir="$apply_dir"
fi &&
head_name=$(cat "$state_dir"/head-name) &&
onto=$(cat "$state_dir"/onto) &&
@@ -196,6 +199,23 @@ run_pre_rebase_hook () {
test -f "$apply_dir"/applying &&
die 'It looks like git-am is in progress. Cannot rebase.'
+if test -d "$apply_dir"
+then
+ type=am
+ state_dir="$apply_dir"
+elif test -d "$merge_dir"
+then
+ if test -f "$merge_dir"/interactive
+ then
+ type=interactive
+ interactive_rebase=explicit
+ else
+ type=merge
+ fi
+ state_dir="$merge_dir"
+fi
+test -n "$type" && in_progress=t
+
while test $# != 0
do
case "$1" in
@@ -324,37 +344,24 @@ then
test -z "$onto" &&
test -z "$preserve_merges" ||
usage
- test -d "$apply_dir" -a -z "$interactive_rebase" ||
- test -d "$merge_dir" || die "No rebase in progress?"
+ test -z "$in_progress" && die "No rebase in progress?"
else
- # Make sure we do not have $apply_dir or $merge_dir
- if test -z "$do_merge"
+ # Make sure we do not have a rebase in progress
+ if test -n "$in_progress"
then
- if mkdir "$apply_dir" 2>/dev/null
- then
- rmdir "$apply_dir"
- else
- echo >&2 '
-It seems that I cannot create a rebase-apply directory, and
-I wonder if you are in the middle of patch application or another
-rebase. If that is not the case, please
- rm -fr '"$apply_dir"'
+ die '
+It seems that there is already a "${state_dir##*/}" directory, and
+I wonder if you are in the middle of another rebase. If that is the
+case, please try
+ git rebase (--continue | --abort | --skip)
+If that is not the case, please
+ rm -fr '"$state_dir"'
and run me again. I am stopping in case you still have something
valuable there.'
- exit 1
- fi
- else
- if test -d "$merge_dir"
- then
- die "previous rebase directory $merge_dir still exists." \
- 'Try git rebase (--continue | --abort | --skip)'
- fi
fi
test $# -eq 0 && test -z "$rebase_root" && usage
fi
-test -f "$merge_dir"/interactive && interactive_rebase=explicit
-
test -n "$action" && test -n "$interactive_rebase" && run_interactive_rebase
case "$action" in
@@ -415,6 +422,19 @@ abort)
;;
esac
+if test -n "$interactive_rebase"
+then
+ type=interactive
+ state_dir="$merge_dir"
+elif test -n "$do_merge"
+then
+ type=merge
+ state_dir="$merge_dir"
+else
+ type=am
+ state_dir="$apply_dir"
+fi
+
if test -z "$rebase_root"
then
# The upstream head must be given. Make sure it is valid.
--
1.7.3.2.864.gbbb96
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-25 19:57 [PATCH/RFC 00/20] Refactor rebase Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 01/20] rebase: clearer names for directory variables Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 02/20] rebase: refactor reading of state Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 03/20] rebase: read state outside loop Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 04/20] rebase: remove unused rebase state 'prev_head' Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-26 7:54 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-11-26 18:45 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-29 21:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-11-30 7:29 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 05/20] rebase: act on command line outside parsing loop Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 06/20] rebase: collect check for existing rebase Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 07/20] rebase: stricter check on arguments Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 08/20] rebase: align variable names Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 09/20] rebase: align variable content Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 10/20] rebase: factor out command line option processing Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 11/20] rebase -i: remove now unnecessary directory checks Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 12/20] rebase: reorder validation steps Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 13/20] rebase: factor out reference parsing Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 14/20] rebase: factor out clean work tree check Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 15/20] rebase: factor out call to pre-rebase hook Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 16/20] rebase -i: support --stat Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:58 ` Martin von Zweigbergk [this message]
2010-11-25 19:58 ` [PATCH/RFC 18/20] rebase -m: extract code to new source file Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:58 ` [PATCH/RFC 19/20] rebase: extract am " Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:58 ` [PATCH/RFC 20/20] rebase: show consistent conflict resolution hint Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 20:23 ` [PATCH/RFC 00/20] Refactor rebase Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-26 14:10 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-11-26 19:16 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-27 1:24 ` Sverre Rabbelier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290715083-16919-18-git-send-email-martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com \
--to=martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).