* [PATCH] t9001: Fix test prerequisites
@ 2010-12-29 21:02 Robin H. Johnson
2010-12-29 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2010-12-29 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: Robin H. Johnson
Add in missing Perl prerequisites for new tests of send-email.
Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
---
t/t9001-send-email.sh | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
index 1dc4a92..3271426 100755
--- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
+++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ test_expect_success $PREREQ '--8bit-encoding also treats subject' '
# Note that the patches in this test are deliberately out of order; we
# want to make sure it works even if the cover-letter is not in the
# first mail.
-test_expect_success 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
+test_expect_success $PREREQ 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
rm -fr outdir &&
git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ test_expect_success 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
test -z "$(ls msgtxt*)"
'
-test_expect_success '--force sends cover letter template anyway' '
+test_expect_success $PREREQ '--force sends cover letter template anyway' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
rm -fr outdir &&
git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
--
1.7.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] t9001: Fix test prerequisites
2010-12-29 21:02 [PATCH] t9001: Fix test prerequisites Robin H. Johnson
@ 2010-12-29 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2010-12-29 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robin H. Johnson; +Cc: git, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> writes:
> Add in missing Perl prerequisites for new tests of send-email.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
> ---
> t/t9001-send-email.sh | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Thanks.
> diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
> index 1dc4a92..3271426 100755
> --- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
> +++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
> @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ test_expect_success $PREREQ '--8bit-encoding also treats subject' '
> # Note that the patches in this test are deliberately out of order; we
> # want to make sure it works even if the cover-letter is not in the
> # first mail.
> -test_expect_success 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
> +test_expect_success $PREREQ 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
> clean_fake_sendmail &&
> rm -fr outdir &&
> git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
> @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ test_expect_success 'refusing to send cover letter template' '
> test -z "$(ls msgtxt*)"
> '
>
> -test_expect_success '--force sends cover letter template anyway' '
> +test_expect_success $PREREQ '--force sends cover letter template anyway' '
> clean_fake_sendmail &&
> rm -fr outdir &&
> git format-patch --cover-letter -2 -o outdir &&
This however makes me wonder (Robin, the following is primarily meant for
Ævar to whom 57cd35e (t/t9001-send-email.sh: change from skip_all=* to
prereq skip, 2010-08-13) is credited, and not a complaint to your patch at
all, but you are welcome to comment on it if you feel like).
Everything in this test seem to require $PREREQ now (test_expect_success
always takes the 3-parameter form). Does it suggest that we might want to
allow tests to define a "global prerequisite", e.g.
GIT_TESTS_PREREQ="PERL"
export GIT_TESTS_PREREQ
and make the traditional 2-parameter test_expect_success without an
explicit prerequisite take notice? Would it let us not have to worry
about this kind of breakages? Or is 9001 a very tiny minority oddball
that must have $PREREQ everywhere and such a test framework feature would
be an overkill?
More importantly, 9001 is all about send-email and we know upfront that we
want to skip everything when PERL prerequisite is not met. Why not a
simple
if ! test_have_prereq PERL
then
test_done
fi
insufficient?
Who cares "skipped statistics"? When one does not care about testing
send-email at all, why should one care how many tests on that program are
skipped? I personally do not think this is worth the trouble, and am very
close (showing two fingers almost touching) to suggest reverting 57cd35e.
Please convince me otherwise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-29 21:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-29 21:02 [PATCH] t9001: Fix test prerequisites Robin H. Johnson
2010-12-29 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).