From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Luck Subject: Where'd my GIT tree go? Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:23:11 -0700 Message-ID: <12c511ca0507062023291a098e@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Tony Luck Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 07 05:28:15 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqN3Y-0001ot-3N for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:28:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262248AbVGGD1R (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:27:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262203AbVGGDYn (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:24:43 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.204]:26986 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262205AbVGGDXM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:23:12 -0400 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so45132nzf for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 20:23:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Weadbmnf6CttzGa+F5Rf4OY6EcQIJb08Dx3JfSbW3iAerXFfQxuWwKi3+xjKudwj0zTKc5cB16W7eINKhlez0pXbR+6FHtHAFRivg1WakXnNr/WNyQPxpyBh6GLQKvNlCvItVMVDvEjDBeFWwsmIy+5Z5ZhQWG6B2F20JIHoI7E= Received: by 10.36.222.60 with SMTP id u60mr155217nzg; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 20:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.59.4 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:23:11 -0700 (PDT) To: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org http://www.kernel.org/git has stopped showing my linux-2.6 tree (the "to Linus" one, my "test-2.6" tree is still there). This is probably my fault ... but I'm not sure exactly why. Here's what I did. Last Thursday I applied a set of patches ... and my "apply" script choked on one of them. Some casual inspection convinced me that the changes had been applied, and I pushed the tree up to kernel.org. But I was wrong, the 2nd out od a series of six was all messed up. And I'd applied a couple more patches on top of that. Since none of this had been pulled by Linus, I thought I'd clean it up and apologise to anyone who had pulled from my tree. So I backed HEAD up to the last good commit. Re-applied the changes with a fixed version of the script, and then expected to find some detritus from the first application in .git/objects. But "git-fsck-cache --unreachable ..." only complained about the 2.6.11 tag/tree. Odd. Then I pushed up to master.kernel.org ... and an hour later when the mirrors did their thing, git-web stopped showing my tree. HEAD is still a symlink to refs/heads/master. And that has the SHA1 of my most recent commit ... which is present in .git/objects. So what's wrong??? -Tony