From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tony Luck" Subject: proxy documentation Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:49:14 -0800 Message-ID: <12c511ca0603101649y51311f0du1a165596428b31b3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 11 01:49:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHsII-00027a-1W for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:49:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752279AbWCKAtP (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:49:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932346AbWCKAtP (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:49:15 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.192]:49388 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752279AbWCKAtP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:49:15 -0500 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i1so928904nzh for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:49:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=uGtwPrx/A2231JDJ/ZIs1NQ3sevh3JNNirZAtWRFatvUo5IT4qYaExV6z495paewjGKaN4hVWj8CMxZFXGFYgzLzq8Z95ev33nfIIM6aQhgjnXAZLI6J5RZ4fIir3k6oj/8SrTR0jVSH8eSM8CVrvFVn8d1ogSDptKNTCOoDG8s= Received: by 10.65.222.6 with SMTP id z6mr1203682qbq; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:49:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.194.4 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:49:14 -0800 (PST) To: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Example documentation for proxy settings in Documentation/git-repo-config.txt shows: [proxy] command="ssh" for "ssh://kernel.org/" But the code in connect.c:git_proxy_command_options() looks for "core.gitproxy" rather than "proxy.command". I've only just started looking at the proxy support ... is it just the name that is wrong in the documentation, or are there other issues here? proxy.command sounds like a better name than core.gitproxy ... so maybe the Docs are "right" and the code is "wrong"? -Tony