From: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>,
Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Subject: [PATCHv3 2/9] send-pack: Attempt to retrieve remote status even if pack-objects fails
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 23:37:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305495440-30836-3-git-send-email-johan@herland.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305495440-30836-1-git-send-email-johan@herland.net>
When pushing, send-pack uses pack-objects to write the pack data to the
receive-pack process running on the remote end. The scenarios where
pack-objects dies unexpectedly, can be roughly divided based whether the
reason for the failure is _local_ (i.e. something in pack-objects caused
it to fail of its own accord), or _remote_ (i.e. something in the remote
receive-pack process caused it to fail, leaving the local pack-objects
process with a broken pipe)
If the reason for the failure is local, we expect pack-objects to report
an appropriate error message to the user.
However, if the reason for the failure is remote, pack-objects will merely
abort because of the broken pipe, and the user is left with no clue as to
the reason why the remote receive-pack process died.
In certain cases, though, the receive-pack process on the other end may have
produced an error message immediately before exiting. This error message may
be currently waiting to be read by the local send-pack process.
Therefore, we should try to read from the remote end, even when pack-objects
dies unexepectedly. We accomplish this by _always_ calling receive_status()
after pack_objects(). If the remote end managed to produce a well-formed
status report before exiting, then receive_status() simply presents that to
the user. Even if the data from the remote end cannot be understood by
receive_status(), it will print that data as part of its error message. In
any case, we give the user as much information about the failure as possible.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
---
I first wrote this patch on a base where e07fd15 (Peff's "send-pack:
unbreak push over stateless rpc") was not present, and then resolved
a conflict when rebasing this patch onto current master. I hope Peff
or Johannes (Sixt) can verify that my patch does not reintroduce the
deadlock they fixed.
...Johan
builtin/send-pack.c | 18 +++++-------------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/send-pack.c b/builtin/send-pack.c
index 4ac2ca9..f571917 100644
--- a/builtin/send-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/send-pack.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
int status_report = 0;
int use_sideband = 0;
unsigned cmds_sent = 0;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
struct async demux;
/* Does the other end support the reporting? */
@@ -339,23 +339,15 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
}
if (new_refs && cmds_sent) {
- if (pack_objects(out, remote_refs, extra_have, args) < 0) {
- for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next)
- ref->status = REF_STATUS_NONE;
- if (args->stateless_rpc)
- close(out);
- if (use_sideband)
- finish_async(&demux);
- return -1;
- }
+ ret = pack_objects(out, remote_refs, extra_have, args);
+ if (ret && args->stateless_rpc)
+ close(out);
}
if (args->stateless_rpc && cmds_sent)
packet_flush(out);
if (status_report && cmds_sent)
- ret = receive_status(in, remote_refs);
- else
- ret = 0;
+ ret |= receive_status(in, remote_refs);
if (args->stateless_rpc)
packet_flush(out);
--
1.7.5.rc1.3.g4d7b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-15 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-13 16:54 [PATCH 2/2] receive-pack: Add receive.denyObjectLimit to refuse push with too many objects Johan Herland
2011-05-13 17:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-14 1:43 ` Johan Herland
2011-05-14 2:03 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] receive-pack: Add receive.objectCountLimit " Johan Herland
2011-05-14 2:30 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-05-14 13:17 ` Johan Herland
2011-05-14 22:17 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-05-15 17:42 ` Johan Herland
2011-05-15 21:37 ` [PATCHv3 0/9] Push limits Johan Herland
2011-05-15 21:37 ` [PATCHv3 1/9] Update technical docs to reflect side-band-64k capability in receive-pack Johan Herland
2011-05-15 21:37 ` Johan Herland [this message]
2011-05-16 4:07 ` [PATCHv3 2/9] send-pack: Attempt to retrieve remote status even if pack-objects fails Jeff King
2011-05-16 6:13 ` Jeff King
2011-05-16 6:39 ` Jeff King
2011-05-16 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] connect: treat generic proxy processes like ssh processes Jeff King
2011-05-16 19:57 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-05-16 23:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-17 5:54 ` Jeff King
2011-05-17 20:14 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-05-18 8:57 ` Jeff King
2011-05-16 6:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] connect: let callers know if connection is a socket Jeff King
2011-05-16 6:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] send-pack: avoid deadlock on git:// push with failed pack-objects Jeff King
2011-05-16 20:02 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-05-17 5:56 ` Jeff King
2011-05-18 20:24 ` [PATCH] Windows: add a wrapper for the shutdown() system call Johannes Sixt
2011-05-15 21:37 ` [PATCHv3 3/9] pack-objects: Allow --max-pack-size to be used together with --stdout Johan Herland
2011-05-15 22:06 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-05-16 1:39 ` Johan Herland
2011-05-16 6:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-16 9:27 ` Johan Herland
2011-05-15 21:37 ` [PATCHv3 4/9] pack-objects: Teach new option --max-object-count, similar to --max-pack-size Johan Herland
2011-05-15 22:07 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-05-15 22:31 ` Johan Herland
2011-05-15 23:48 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-05-16 6:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-16 9:49 ` Johan Herland
2011-05-15 21:37 ` [PATCHv3 5/9] pack-objects: Teach new option --max-commit-count, limiting #commits in pack Johan Herland
2011-05-15 21:37 ` [PATCHv3 6/9] receive-pack: Prepare for addition of the new 'limit-*' family of capabilities Johan Herland
2011-05-16 6:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-16 9:53 ` Johan Herland
2011-05-16 22:02 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-05-16 22:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-16 22:09 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-05-16 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-16 22:16 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-05-15 21:37 ` [PATCHv3 7/9] send-pack/receive-pack: Allow server to refuse pushes with too many objects Johan Herland
2011-05-15 21:37 ` [PATCHv3 8/9] send-pack/receive-pack: Allow server to refuse pushing too large packs Johan Herland
2011-05-15 21:37 ` [PATCHv3 9/9] send-pack/receive-pack: Allow server to refuse pushes with too many commits Johan Herland
2011-05-15 21:52 ` [PATCHv3 0/9] Push limits Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2011-05-14 17:50 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] receive-pack: Add receive.objectCountLimit to refuse push with too many objects Junio C Hamano
2011-05-14 22:27 ` Shawn Pearce
2011-05-13 18:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] receive-pack: Add receive.denyObjectLimit " Johannes Sixt
2011-05-14 1:49 ` Johan Herland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305495440-30836-3-git-send-email-johan@herland.net \
--to=johan@herland.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).