Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] path-walk: support blob size limit filter

[Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>]

On 5/11/2026 9:33 PM, Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 06:13:04PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
>> [...] Blobs whose size cannot be determined (e.g. missing in a partial
>> clone) are conservatively included, matching the existing filter
>> behavior.
> 
> Makes sense, but...
> 
>> Notice that this inspection of object sizes requires the content to be
>> present in the repository. The odb_read_object_info() call will download
>> a missing blob on-demand.
> 
> ... this says that we do download missing blobs on-demand. Should we be
> (temporarily) disabling 'fetch_if_missing' for this phase, or using
> odb_read_object_info_extended() with the OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT
> bit set?

I don't know that we'd want to set this everywhere. The case that is
technically correct, but probably not ideal, is someone running 'git
pack-objects --filter=blob:<size>' from a blobless partial clone. They
are asking for something inefficient to create, but we _can_ still
create it. 
> I don't know enough about 'git backfill' to know whether the current
> behavior is more reasonable than the above suggestion, so please let me
> know if I'm missing something here!
For 'git backfill', a size limit filter doesn't make sense as it's all
about the client making decisions about how to download batches of
objects based on the local tree data. Filtering on size isn't something
that the client can infer in advance of downloading everything. Further,
the direct blob requests to the server can't be filtered by size, by
design.

Thanks,
-Stolee