From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: gitster@pobox.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jim Foucar <jgfouca@sandia.gov>,
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 46/56] merge-recursive: Make modify/delete handling code reusable
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:20:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313126429-17368-47-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313126429-17368-1-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com>
modify/delete and rename/delete share a lot of similarities; we'd like all
the criss-cross and D/F conflict handling specializations to be shared
between the two.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
No changes since v1.
merge-recursive.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
t/t6022-merge-rename.sh | 4 +-
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index c305857..17fe7c3 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -994,6 +994,46 @@ static struct merge_file_info merge_file(struct merge_options *o,
return merge_file_1(o, &one, &a, &b, branch1, branch2);
}
+static void handle_change_delete(struct merge_options *o,
+ const char *path,
+ const unsigned char *o_sha, int o_mode,
+ const unsigned char *a_sha, int a_mode,
+ const unsigned char *b_sha, int b_mode,
+ const char *change, const char *change_past)
+{
+ char *renamed = NULL;
+ if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth)) {
+ renamed = unique_path(o, path, a_sha ? o->branch1 : o->branch2);
+ }
+
+ if (o->call_depth) {
+ /*
+ * We cannot arbitrarily accept either a_sha or b_sha as
+ * correct; since there is no true "middle point" between
+ * them, simply reuse the base version for virtual merge base.
+ */
+ remove_file_from_cache(path);
+ update_file(o, 0, o_sha, o_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
+ } else if (!a_sha) {
+ output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (%s/delete): %s deleted in %s "
+ "and %s in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
+ change, path, o->branch1,
+ change_past, o->branch2, o->branch2, path,
+ NULL == renamed ? "" : " at ",
+ NULL == renamed ? "" : renamed);
+ update_file(o, 0, b_sha, b_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
+ } else {
+ output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (%s/delete): %s deleted in %s "
+ "and %s in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
+ change, path, o->branch2,
+ change_past, o->branch1, o->branch1, path,
+ NULL == renamed ? "" : " at ",
+ NULL == renamed ? "" : renamed);
+ update_file(o, 0, a_sha, a_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
+ }
+ free(renamed);
+}
+
static void conflict_rename_delete(struct merge_options *o,
struct diff_filepair *pair,
const char *rename_branch,
@@ -1411,44 +1451,18 @@ error_return:
return ret;
}
-static void handle_delete_modify(struct merge_options *o,
+static void handle_modify_delete(struct merge_options *o,
const char *path,
unsigned char *o_sha, int o_mode,
unsigned char *a_sha, int a_mode,
unsigned char *b_sha, int b_mode)
{
- char *renamed = NULL;
- if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth)) {
- renamed = unique_path(o, path, a_sha ? o->branch1 : o->branch2);
- }
-
- if (o->call_depth) {
- /*
- * We cannot arbitrarily accept either a_sha or b_sha as
- * correct; since there is no true "middle point" between
- * them, simply reuse the base version for virtual merge base.
- */
- remove_file_from_cache(path);
- update_file(o, 0, o_sha, o_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
- } else if (!a_sha) {
- output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (delete/modify): %s deleted in %s "
- "and modified in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
- path, o->branch1,
- o->branch2, o->branch2, path,
- NULL == renamed ? "" : " at ",
- NULL == renamed ? "" : renamed);
- update_file(o, 0, b_sha, b_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
- } else {
- output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (delete/modify): %s deleted in %s "
- "and modified in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
- path, o->branch2,
- o->branch1, o->branch1, path,
- NULL == renamed ? "" : " at ",
- NULL == renamed ? "" : renamed);
- update_file(o, 0, a_sha, a_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
- }
- free(renamed);
-
+ handle_change_delete(o,
+ path,
+ o_sha, o_mode,
+ a_sha, a_mode,
+ b_sha, b_mode,
+ "modify", "modified");
}
static int merge_content(struct merge_options *o,
@@ -1614,7 +1628,7 @@ static int process_entry(struct merge_options *o,
} else {
/* Modify/delete; deleted side may have put a directory in the way */
clean_merge = 0;
- handle_delete_modify(o, path, o_sha, o_mode,
+ handle_modify_delete(o, path, o_sha, o_mode,
a_sha, a_mode, b_sha, b_mode);
}
} else if ((!o_sha && a_sha && !b_sha) ||
diff --git a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
index d96d3c5..74dcf20 100755
--- a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
+++ b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ test_expect_success 'Rename+D/F conflict; renamed file merges but dir in way' '
git checkout -q renamed-file-has-no-conflicts^0 &&
test_must_fail git merge --strategy=recursive dir-in-way >output &&
- grep "CONFLICT (delete/modify): dir/file-in-the-way" output &&
+ grep "CONFLICT (modify/delete): dir/file-in-the-way" output &&
grep "Auto-merging dir" output &&
grep "Adding as dir~HEAD instead" output &&
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ test_expect_success 'Same as previous, but merged other way' '
test_must_fail git merge --strategy=recursive renamed-file-has-no-conflicts >output 2>errors &&
! grep "error: refusing to lose untracked file at" errors &&
- grep "CONFLICT (delete/modify): dir/file-in-the-way" output &&
+ grep "CONFLICT (modify/delete): dir/file-in-the-way" output &&
grep "Auto-merging dir" output &&
grep "Adding as dir~renamed-file-has-no-conflicts instead" output &&
--
1.7.6.100.gac5c1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-12 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-12 5:19 [PATCHv2 00/57] Re-roll of en/merge-recursive from pu Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 01/56] t6042: Add a testcase where git deletes an untracked file Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 02/56] t6042: Add failing testcase for rename/modify/add-source conflict Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 03/56] t6042: Add a pair of cases where undetected renames cause issues Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 04/56] t6042: Add a testcase where undetected rename causes silent file deletion Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 05/56] t6042: Add tests for content issues with modify/rename/directory conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 06/56] t6042: Ensure rename/rename conflicts leave index and workdir in sane state Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 07/56] t6042: Add failing testcases for rename/rename/add-{source,dest} conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 08/56] t6036: Add differently resolved modify/delete conflict in criss-cross test Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 09/56] t6036: criss-cross with weird content can fool git into clean merge Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 10/56] t6036: tests for criss-cross merges with various directory/file conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 11/56] t6036: criss-cross w/ rename/rename(1to2)/modify+rename/rename(2to1)/modify Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 12/56] t6036: criss-cross + rename/rename(1to2)/add-source + modify/modify Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 13/56] t6022: Remove unnecessary untracked files to make test cleaner Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 14/56] t6022: New tests checking for unnecessary updates of files Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 15/56] t6022: Add testcase for merging a renamed file with a simple change Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 16/56] merge-recursive: Make BUG message more legible by adding a newline Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 17/56] merge-recursive: Correct a comment Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 18/56] merge-recursive: Mark some diff_filespec struct arguments const Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 19/56] merge-recursive: Consolidate different update_stages functions Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 20/56] merge-recursive: Remember to free generated unique path names Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 21/56] merge-recursive: Avoid working directory changes during recursive case Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 22/56] merge-recursive: Fix recursive case with D/F conflict via add/add conflict Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 23/56] merge-recursive: Fix sorting order and directory change assumptions Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 24/56] merge-recursive: Fix code checking for D/F conflicts still being present Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 25/56] merge-recursive: Save D/F conflict filenames instead of unlinking them Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:19 ` [PATCHv2 26/56] merge-recursive: Split was_tracked() out of would_lose_untracked() Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 27/56] string-list: Add API to remove an item from an unsorted list Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 7:00 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-08-12 9:27 ` Alex Riesen
2011-08-12 22:14 ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-13 9:08 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 28/56] merge-recursive: Allow make_room_for_path() to remove D/F entries Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 29/56] merge-recursive: Split update_stages_and_entry; only update stages at end Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 30/56] merge-recursive: Fix deletion of untracked file in rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 31/56] merge-recursive: Make dead code for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts undead Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 32/56] merge-recursive: Add comments about handling rename/add-source cases Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 33/56] merge-recursive: Improve handling of rename target vs. directory addition Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 34/56] merge-recursive: Consolidate process_entry() and process_df_entry() Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 35/56] merge-recursive: Cleanup and consolidation of rename_conflict_info Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 36/56] merge-recursive: Provide more info in conflict markers with file renames Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 37/56] merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 38/56] merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive case Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 39/56] merge-recursive: Introduce a merge_file convenience function Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 40/56] merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge base Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 41/56] merge-recursive: Small cleanups for conflict_rename_rename_1to2 Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 42/56] merge-recursive: Defer rename/rename(2to1) handling until process_entry Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 43/56] merge-recursive: Record more data needed for merging with dual renames Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 44/56] merge-recursive: Create function for merging with branchname:file markers Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 45/56] merge-recursive: Consider modifications in rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 47/56] merge-recursive: Have conflict_rename_delete reuse modify/delete code Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 48/56] merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 49/56] merge-recursive: Fix working copy handling for rename/rename/add/add Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 50/56] t3030: fix accidental success in symlink rename Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 51/56] t6022: Add testcase for spurious "refusing to lose untracked" messages Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 52/56] merge-recursive: Fix spurious 'refusing to lose untracked file...' messages Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 53/56] t6022: Additional tests checking for unnecessary updates of files Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 54/56] merge-recursive: Avoid unnecessary file rewrites Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 55/56] t6036: criss-cross + rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest + simple modify Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:20 ` [PATCHv2 56/56] merge-recursive: Fix virtual merge base for rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest Elijah Newren
2011-08-12 5:48 ` [PATCHv2 00/57] Re-roll of en/merge-recursive from pu Junio C Hamano
2011-08-12 21:59 ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-13 2:37 ` Elijah Newren
2011-08-13 2:23 ` [PATCHv2 57/57] merge-recursive: Don't re-sort a list whose order we depend upon Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313126429-17368-47-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jgfouca@sandia.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).