From: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
To: "Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
Marat Radchenko <marat@slonopotamus.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] xdiff/xprepare: improve O(n*m) performance in xdl_cleanup_records()
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:53:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313546037-4104-1-git-send-email-rctay89@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd3g5i7ci.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In xdl_cleanup_records(), we see O(n*m) performance, where n is the
number of records from xdf->dstart to xdf->dend, and m is the size of a
bucket in xdf->rhash (<= by mlim).
Here, we improve this to O(n) by pre-computing nm (in rcrec->len(1|2))
in xdl_classify_record().
Reported-by: Marat Radchenko <marat@slonopotamus.org>
Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
---
Changed in v2:
- free() xdlclassifier_t->rcrecs
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> From 0da9ec94604978f877e7f7c00d307b5cdbb22b29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:35:28 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] xdiff/xprepare: improve O(n*m) performance in
>> ?xdl_cleanup_records()
>
> You do not need these four lines. Thanks.
Oops, I directly pasted git-format-patch output into Claws-mail, sorry
about that.
>> In xdl_cleanup_records(), we see O(n*m) performance, where n is the
>> number of records from xdf->dstart to xdf->dend, and m is the size of a
>> bucket in xdf->rhash (<= by mlim).
>>
>> Here, we improve this to O(n) by pre-computing nm (in rcrec->len(1|2))
>> in xdl_classify_record().
>
> Could we have some benchmarks to let the readers get a feel of how much
> improvement this patch brings in?
On my msysgit machine with Marat's problematic repo
(git://slonopotamus.org/git-diff):
rctay@TEST-123 /tmp/slono
$ time git show >/dev/null
real 0m8.538s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.031s
rctay@TEST-123 /tmp/slono
$ time /git/git show >/dev/null
real 0m0.672s
user 0m0.031s
sys 0m0.031s
> This tries to trade cycles with memory, right? How much bloat are we
> talking about here?
The main source of memory bloat would be the xdlclassifier_t->rcrecs
lookup table. This is needed to find the classifier record (xdlclass_t)
associated with a xrecord_t.
In an earlier iteration, I had a pointer on each xrecord_t to the
classifier record, instead of a lookup table, but I casted it to void*,
since I wasn't sure if the xdlclass_t definition should be shifted to
xtypes.h (and thus made public to xdiff and git).
The first is cleaner but the second is lighter. I'd appreciate comments
on this.
xdiff/xprepare.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xdiff/xprepare.c b/xdiff/xprepare.c
index 1689085..05a8f01 100644
--- a/xdiff/xprepare.c
+++ b/xdiff/xprepare.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ typedef struct s_xdlclass {
char const *line;
long size;
long idx;
+ long len1, len2;
} xdlclass_t;
typedef struct s_xdlclassifier {
@@ -41,6 +42,8 @@ typedef struct s_xdlclassifier {
long hsize;
xdlclass_t **rchash;
chastore_t ncha;
+ xdlclass_t **rcrecs;
+ long alloc;
long count;
long flags;
} xdlclassifier_t;
@@ -50,15 +53,15 @@ typedef struct s_xdlclassifier {
static int xdl_init_classifier(xdlclassifier_t *cf, long size, long flags);
static void xdl_free_classifier(xdlclassifier_t *cf);
-static int xdl_classify_record(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xrecord_t **rhash, unsigned int hbits,
- xrecord_t *rec);
-static int xdl_prepare_ctx(mmfile_t *mf, long narec, xpparam_t const *xpp,
+static int xdl_classify_record(unsigned int pass, xdlclassifier_t *cf, xrecord_t **rhash,
+ unsigned int hbits, xrecord_t *rec);
+static int xdl_prepare_ctx(unsigned int pass, mmfile_t *mf, long narec, xpparam_t const *xpp,
xdlclassifier_t *cf, xdfile_t *xdf);
static void xdl_free_ctx(xdfile_t *xdf);
static int xdl_clean_mmatch(char const *dis, long i, long s, long e);
-static int xdl_cleanup_records(xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2);
+static int xdl_cleanup_records(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2);
static int xdl_trim_ends(xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2);
-static int xdl_optimize_ctxs(xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2);
+static int xdl_optimize_ctxs(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2);
@@ -83,6 +86,14 @@ static int xdl_init_classifier(xdlclassifier_t *cf, long size, long flags) {
for (i = 0; i < cf->hsize; i++)
cf->rchash[i] = NULL;
+ cf->alloc = size;
+ if (!(cf->rcrecs = (xdlclass_t **) xdl_malloc(cf->alloc * sizeof(xdlclass_t *)))) {
+
+ xdl_free(cf->rchash);
+ xdl_cha_free(&cf->ncha);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
cf->count = 0;
return 0;
@@ -91,16 +102,18 @@ static int xdl_init_classifier(xdlclassifier_t *cf, long size, long flags) {
static void xdl_free_classifier(xdlclassifier_t *cf) {
+ xdl_free(cf->rcrecs);
xdl_free(cf->rchash);
xdl_cha_free(&cf->ncha);
}
-static int xdl_classify_record(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xrecord_t **rhash, unsigned int hbits,
- xrecord_t *rec) {
+static int xdl_classify_record(unsigned int pass, xdlclassifier_t *cf, xrecord_t **rhash,
+ unsigned int hbits, xrecord_t *rec) {
long hi;
char const *line;
xdlclass_t *rcrec;
+ xdlclass_t **rcrecs;
line = rec->ptr;
hi = (long) XDL_HASHLONG(rec->ha, cf->hbits);
@@ -116,13 +129,25 @@ static int xdl_classify_record(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xrecord_t **rhash, unsigned
return -1;
}
rcrec->idx = cf->count++;
+ if (cf->count > cf->alloc) {
+ cf->alloc *= 2;
+ if (!(rcrecs = (xdlclass_t **) xdl_realloc(cf->rcrecs, cf->alloc * sizeof(xdlclass_t *)))) {
+
+ return -1;
+ }
+ cf->rcrecs = rcrecs;
+ }
+ cf->rcrecs[rcrec->idx] = rcrec;
rcrec->line = line;
rcrec->size = rec->size;
rcrec->ha = rec->ha;
+ rcrec->len1 = rcrec->len2 = 0;
rcrec->next = cf->rchash[hi];
cf->rchash[hi] = rcrec;
}
+ (pass == 1) ? rcrec->len1++ : rcrec->len2++;
+
rec->ha = (unsigned long) rcrec->idx;
hi = (long) XDL_HASHLONG(rec->ha, hbits);
@@ -133,7 +158,7 @@ static int xdl_classify_record(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xrecord_t **rhash, unsigned
}
-static int xdl_prepare_ctx(mmfile_t *mf, long narec, xpparam_t const *xpp,
+static int xdl_prepare_ctx(unsigned int pass, mmfile_t *mf, long narec, xpparam_t const *xpp,
xdlclassifier_t *cf, xdfile_t *xdf) {
unsigned int hbits;
long i, nrec, hsize, bsize;
@@ -200,7 +225,7 @@ static int xdl_prepare_ctx(mmfile_t *mf, long narec, xpparam_t const *xpp,
crec->ha = hav;
recs[nrec++] = crec;
- if (xdl_classify_record(cf, rhash, hbits, crec) < 0) {
+ if (xdl_classify_record(pass, cf, rhash, hbits, crec) < 0) {
xdl_free(rhash);
xdl_free(recs);
@@ -276,28 +301,28 @@ int xdl_prepare_env(mmfile_t *mf1, mmfile_t *mf2, xpparam_t const *xpp,
return -1;
}
- if (xdl_prepare_ctx(mf1, enl1, xpp, &cf, &xe->xdf1) < 0) {
+ if (xdl_prepare_ctx(1, mf1, enl1, xpp, &cf, &xe->xdf1) < 0) {
xdl_free_classifier(&cf);
return -1;
}
- if (xdl_prepare_ctx(mf2, enl2, xpp, &cf, &xe->xdf2) < 0) {
+ if (xdl_prepare_ctx(2, mf2, enl2, xpp, &cf, &xe->xdf2) < 0) {
xdl_free_ctx(&xe->xdf1);
xdl_free_classifier(&cf);
return -1;
}
- xdl_free_classifier(&cf);
-
if (!(xpp->flags & XDF_PATIENCE_DIFF) &&
- xdl_optimize_ctxs(&xe->xdf1, &xe->xdf2) < 0) {
+ xdl_optimize_ctxs(&cf, &xe->xdf1, &xe->xdf2) < 0) {
xdl_free_ctx(&xe->xdf2);
xdl_free_ctx(&xe->xdf1);
return -1;
}
+ xdl_free_classifier(&cf);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -372,11 +397,10 @@ static int xdl_clean_mmatch(char const *dis, long i, long s, long e) {
* matches on the other file. Also, lines that have multiple matches
* might be potentially discarded if they happear in a run of discardable.
*/
-static int xdl_cleanup_records(xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2) {
- long i, nm, rhi, nreff, mlim;
- unsigned long hav;
+static int xdl_cleanup_records(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2) {
+ long i, nm, nreff;
xrecord_t **recs;
- xrecord_t *rec;
+ xdlclass_t *rcrec;
char *dis, *dis1, *dis2;
if (!(dis = (char *) xdl_malloc(xdf1->nrec + xdf2->nrec + 2))) {
@@ -387,26 +411,16 @@ static int xdl_cleanup_records(xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2) {
dis1 = dis;
dis2 = dis1 + xdf1->nrec + 1;
- if ((mlim = xdl_bogosqrt(xdf1->nrec)) > XDL_MAX_EQLIMIT)
- mlim = XDL_MAX_EQLIMIT;
for (i = xdf1->dstart, recs = &xdf1->recs[xdf1->dstart]; i <= xdf1->dend; i++, recs++) {
- hav = (*recs)->ha;
- rhi = (long) XDL_HASHLONG(hav, xdf2->hbits);
- for (nm = 0, rec = xdf2->rhash[rhi]; rec; rec = rec->next)
- if (rec->ha == hav && ++nm == mlim)
- break;
- dis1[i] = (nm == 0) ? 0: (nm >= mlim) ? 2: 1;
+ rcrec = cf->rcrecs[(*recs)->ha];
+ nm = rcrec ? rcrec->len2 : 0;
+ dis1[i] = (nm == 0) ? 0: 1;
}
- if ((mlim = xdl_bogosqrt(xdf2->nrec)) > XDL_MAX_EQLIMIT)
- mlim = XDL_MAX_EQLIMIT;
for (i = xdf2->dstart, recs = &xdf2->recs[xdf2->dstart]; i <= xdf2->dend; i++, recs++) {
- hav = (*recs)->ha;
- rhi = (long) XDL_HASHLONG(hav, xdf1->hbits);
- for (nm = 0, rec = xdf1->rhash[rhi]; rec; rec = rec->next)
- if (rec->ha == hav && ++nm == mlim)
- break;
- dis2[i] = (nm == 0) ? 0: (nm >= mlim) ? 2: 1;
+ rcrec = cf->rcrecs[(*recs)->ha];
+ nm = rcrec ? rcrec->len1 : 0;
+ dis2[i] = (nm == 0) ? 0: 1;
}
for (nreff = 0, i = xdf1->dstart, recs = &xdf1->recs[xdf1->dstart];
@@ -468,10 +482,10 @@ static int xdl_trim_ends(xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2) {
}
-static int xdl_optimize_ctxs(xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2) {
+static int xdl_optimize_ctxs(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xdf2) {
if (xdl_trim_ends(xdf1, xdf2) < 0 ||
- xdl_cleanup_records(xdf1, xdf2) < 0) {
+ xdl_cleanup_records(cf, xdf1, xdf2) < 0) {
return -1;
}
--
1.7.6.12.g6486a.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-17 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-09 7:51 git diff is slow (--patience is fast) Marat Radchenko
2011-08-09 10:49 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2011-08-09 11:39 ` Marat Radchenko
2011-08-16 3:01 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2011-08-16 3:11 ` [PATCH] xdiff/xprepare: improve O(n*m) performance in xdl_cleanup_records() Tay Ray Chuan
2011-08-16 3:37 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2011-08-16 17:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-17 1:53 ` Tay Ray Chuan [this message]
2011-08-17 5:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeff King
2011-08-17 15:55 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2011-08-18 22:44 ` Jeff King
2011-08-19 17:12 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2011-08-21 9:24 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-08-24 6:29 ` Marat Radchenko
2011-08-24 6:32 ` Marat Radchenko
2011-08-27 8:50 ` Marat Radchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313546037-4104-1-git-send-email-rctay89@gmail.com \
--to=rctay89@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=marat@slonopotamus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).