git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Prevent force updating of the current branch
@ 2011-08-20 21:49 Conrad Irwin
  2011-08-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] Prevent force-updating " Conrad Irwin
  2011-08-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] Show interpreted branch name in error messages Conrad Irwin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Conrad Irwin @ 2011-08-20 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git; +Cc: gitster

I noticed when trying to improve the user-experience of creating
ambiguous branches [1] that there are insufficient checks to safeguard
git-branch -M and git-checkout -B from over-writing the current branch.

Conrad

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/179503

---
 branch.c                   |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 branch.h                   |    8 ++++++++
 builtin/branch.c           |    6 +-----
 builtin/checkout.c         |   12 +++---------
 t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 t/t3200-branch.sh          |   12 ++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] Prevent force-updating of the current branch
  2011-08-20 21:49 [PATCH] Prevent force updating of the current branch Conrad Irwin
@ 2011-08-20 21:49 ` Conrad Irwin
  2011-08-23 18:20   ` Junio C Hamano
  2011-08-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] Show interpreted branch name in error messages Conrad Irwin
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Conrad Irwin @ 2011-08-20 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git; +Cc: gitster, Conrad Irwin

git branch -M <foo> <current-branch> could be used to change the branch
to which HEAD points, without the necessary house-keeping that git reset
normally does to make this operation sensible. It would leave the reflog
in a confusing state (you would be warned when trying to read it) and
had an apparently side-effect of staging the diff between <current branch>
and <foo>.

git checkout -B <current branch> <foo> was also partly vulnerable to
this bug; due to inconsistent pre-flight checks it would perform half of
its task and then abort just before rewriting the branch. Again this
manifested itself as the index file getting out-of-sync with HEAD.

git checkout -f already guarded against this problem, and aborted with
a fatal error.

git branch -M, git checkout -B and git branch -f now use the same checks
before allowing a branch to be created. These prevent you from updating
the current branch.

We considered suggesting the use of "git reset" in the failure message
but concluded that it was not possible to discern what the user was
actually trying to do.

Signed-off-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
---
 branch.c                   |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 branch.h                   |    8 ++++++++
 builtin/branch.c           |    6 +-----
 builtin/checkout.c         |   12 +++---------
 t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh |    8 ++++++++
 t/t3200-branch.sh          |   12 ++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
index c0c865a..ff84b5b 100644
--- a/branch.c
+++ b/branch.c
@@ -135,6 +135,26 @@ static int setup_tracking(const char *new_ref, const char *orig_ref,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int validate_new_branchname(const char *name, struct strbuf *ref, int force)
+{
+	const char *head;
+	unsigned char sha1[20];
+
+	if (strbuf_check_branch_ref(ref, name))
+		die("'%s' is not a valid branch name.", name);
+
+	if (!ref_exists(ref->buf))
+		return 0;
+	else if (!force)
+		die("A branch named '%s' already exists.", name);
+
+	head = resolve_ref("HEAD", sha1, 0, NULL);
+	if (!is_bare_repository() && head && !strcmp(head, ref->buf))
+		die("Cannot force update the current branch.");
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
 void create_branch(const char *head,
 		   const char *name, const char *start_name,
 		   int force, int reflog, enum branch_track track)
@@ -151,17 +171,11 @@ void create_branch(const char *head,
 	if (track == BRANCH_TRACK_EXPLICIT || track == BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE)
 		explicit_tracking = 1;
 
-	if (strbuf_check_branch_ref(&ref, name))
-		die("'%s' is not a valid branch name.", name);
-
-	if (resolve_ref(ref.buf, sha1, 1, NULL)) {
-		if (!force && track == BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE)
+	if (validate_new_branchname(name, &ref, force || track == BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE)) {
+		if (!force)
 			dont_change_ref = 1;
-		else if (!force)
-			die("A branch named '%s' already exists.", name);
-		else if (!is_bare_repository() && head && !strcmp(head, name))
-			die("Cannot force update the current branch.");
-		forcing = 1;
+		else
+			forcing = 1;
 	}
 
 	real_ref = NULL;
diff --git a/branch.h b/branch.h
index 4026e38..01544e2 100644
--- a/branch.h
+++ b/branch.h
@@ -16,6 +16,14 @@ void create_branch(const char *head, const char *name, const char *start_name,
 		   int force, int reflog, enum branch_track track);
 
 /*
+ * Validates that the requested branch may be created, returning the
+ * interpreted ref in ref, force indicates whether (non-head) branches
+ * may be overwritten. A non-zero return value indicates that the force
+ * parameter was non-zero and the branch already exists.
+ */
+int validate_new_branchname(const char *name, struct strbuf *ref, int force);
+
+/*
  * Remove information about the state of working on the current
  * branch. (E.g., MERGE_HEAD)
  */
diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
index 3142daa..40f885c 100644
--- a/builtin/branch.c
+++ b/builtin/branch.c
@@ -566,11 +566,7 @@ static void rename_branch(const char *oldname, const char *newname, int force)
 			die(_("Invalid branch name: '%s'"), oldname);
 	}
 
-	if (strbuf_check_branch_ref(&newref, newname))
-		die(_("Invalid branch name: '%s'"), newname);
-
-	if (resolve_ref(newref.buf, sha1, 1, NULL) && !force)
-		die(_("A branch named '%s' already exists."), newref.buf + 11);
+	validate_new_branchname(newname, &newref, force);
 
 	strbuf_addf(&logmsg, "Branch: renamed %s to %s",
 		 oldref.buf, newref.buf);
diff --git a/builtin/checkout.c b/builtin/checkout.c
index d647a31..fc4e008 100644
--- a/builtin/checkout.c
+++ b/builtin/checkout.c
@@ -1072,15 +1072,9 @@ int cmd_checkout(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 
 	if (opts.new_branch) {
 		struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
-		if (strbuf_check_branch_ref(&buf, opts.new_branch))
-			die(_("git checkout: we do not like '%s' as a branch name."),
-			    opts.new_branch);
-		if (ref_exists(buf.buf)) {
-			opts.branch_exists = 1;
-			if (!opts.new_branch_force)
-				die(_("git checkout: branch %s already exists"),
-				    opts.new_branch);
-		}
+
+		opts.branch_exists = validate_new_branchname(opts.new_branch, &buf, !!opts.new_branch_force);
+
 		strbuf_release(&buf);
 	}
 
diff --git a/t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh b/t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh
index a42e039..b66db2b 100755
--- a/t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh
+++ b/t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh
@@ -180,4 +180,12 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout -b <describe>' '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'checkout -B to the current branch fails before merging' '
+	git checkout branch1 &&
+	setup_dirty_mergeable &&
+	git commit -mfooble &&
+	test_must_fail git checkout -B branch1 initial &&
+	test_must_fail test_dirty_mergeable
+'
+
 test_done
diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh
index 9e69c8c..cb6458d 100755
--- a/t/t3200-branch.sh
+++ b/t/t3200-branch.sh
@@ -98,6 +98,18 @@ test_expect_success 'git branch -m q r/q should fail when r exists' '
 	test_must_fail git branch -m q r/q
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'git branch -M foo bar should fail when bar is checked out' '
+	git branch bar &&
+	git checkout -b foo &&
+	test_must_fail git branch -M bar foo
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git branch -M baz bam should succeed when baz is checked out' '
+	git checkout -b baz &&
+	git branch bam &&
+	git branch -M baz bam
+'
+
 mv .git/config .git/config-saved
 
 test_expect_success 'git branch -m q q2 without config should succeed' '
-- 
1.7.6.562.g0b2d4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] Show interpreted branch name in error messages
  2011-08-20 21:49 [PATCH] Prevent force updating of the current branch Conrad Irwin
  2011-08-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] Prevent force-updating " Conrad Irwin
@ 2011-08-20 21:49 ` Conrad Irwin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Conrad Irwin @ 2011-08-20 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git; +Cc: gitster, Conrad Irwin

Change the error message when doing: "git branch @{-1}",
"git checkout -b @{-1}", or "git branch -m foo @{-1}"

 * was: A branch named '@{-1}' already exists.
 * now: A branch named 'bar' already exists.

Signed-off-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
---
 branch.c                   |    2 +-
 t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh |    9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
index ff84b5b..1fe3078 100644
--- a/branch.c
+++ b/branch.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ int validate_new_branchname(const char *name, struct strbuf *ref, int force)
 	if (!ref_exists(ref->buf))
 		return 0;
 	else if (!force)
-		die("A branch named '%s' already exists.", name);
+		die("A branch named '%s' already exists.", ref->buf + strlen("refs/heads/"));
 
 	head = resolve_ref("HEAD", sha1, 0, NULL);
 	if (!is_bare_repository() && head && !strcmp(head, ref->buf))
diff --git a/t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh b/t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh
index b66db2b..75874e8 100755
--- a/t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh
+++ b/t/t2018-checkout-branch.sh
@@ -118,6 +118,15 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout -b to an existing branch fails' '
 	test_must_fail do_checkout branch2 $HEAD2
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'checkout -b to @{-1} fails with the right branch name' '
+	git reset --hard HEAD &&
+	git checkout branch1 &&
+	git checkout branch2 &&
+	echo  >expect "fatal: A branch named '\''branch1'\'' already exists." &&
+	test_must_fail git checkout -b @{-1} 2>actual &&
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'checkout -B to an existing branch resets branch to HEAD' '
 	git checkout branch1 &&
 
-- 
1.7.6.562.g0b2d4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Prevent force-updating of the current branch
  2011-08-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] Prevent force-updating " Conrad Irwin
@ 2011-08-23 18:20   ` Junio C Hamano
  2011-08-23 19:20     ` Conrad Irwin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-08-23 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Conrad Irwin; +Cc: git, gitster

Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com> writes:

> git branch -M <foo> <current-branch> could be used to change the branch
> to which HEAD points, without the necessary house-keeping that git reset
> normally does to make this operation sensible. It would leave the reflog
> in a confusing state (you would be warned when trying to read it) and
> had an apparently side-effect of staging the diff between <current branch>
> and <foo>.

The last two lines are redundant (it is "without the house-keeping of
reset"); I'll remove "and had an apparently...".

> git checkout -B <current branch> <foo> was also partly vulnerable to
> this bug; due to inconsistent pre-flight checks it would perform half of
> its task and then abort just before rewriting the branch. Again this
> manifested itself as the index file getting out-of-sync with HEAD.
>
> git checkout -f already guarded against this problem, and aborted with
> a fatal error.

I assume you mean "branch -f". I'll rewrite it so, and in the present
tense.

> git branch -M, git checkout -B and git branch -f now use the same checks
> before allowing a branch to be created. These prevent you from updating
> the current branch.

Looks good ;-). Also the patch looks good, too.

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Prevent force-updating of the current branch
  2011-08-23 18:20   ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2011-08-23 19:20     ` Conrad Irwin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Conrad Irwin @ 2011-08-23 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> git branch -M <foo> <current-branch> could be used to change the branch
>> to which HEAD points, without the necessary house-keeping that git reset
>> normally does to make this operation sensible. It would leave the reflog
>> in a confusing state (you would be warned when trying to read it) and
>> had an apparently side-effect of staging the diff between <current branch>
>> and <foo>.
>
> The last two lines are redundant (it is "without the house-keeping of
> reset"); I'll remove "and had an apparently...".

That's fine by me.

>> git checkout -f already guarded against this problem, and aborted with
>> a fatal error.
>
> I assume you mean "branch -f". I'll rewrite it so, and in the present
> tense.

Yes. Thank you.

>
>> git branch -M, git checkout -B and git branch -f now use the same checks
>> before allowing a branch to be created. These prevent you from updating
>> the current branch.
>
> Looks good ;-). Also the patch looks good, too.
>

Glad to hear :).

Conrad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-23 19:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-20 21:49 [PATCH] Prevent force updating of the current branch Conrad Irwin
2011-08-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] Prevent force-updating " Conrad Irwin
2011-08-23 18:20   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-23 19:20     ` Conrad Irwin
2011-08-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] Show interpreted branch name in error messages Conrad Irwin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).