From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wang Hui Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] sha1_file: normalize alt_odb path before comparing and storing Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:37:46 +0800 Message-ID: <1315391867-31277-1-git-send-email-Hui.Wang@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain To: , , X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 07 19:29:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1Lvt-0001be-EM for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:29:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755594Ab1IGR27 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:28:59 -0400 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:63192 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753689Ab1IGR25 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:28:57 -0400 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p87AbUsH005434 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 03:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (128.224.163.220) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 03:37:30 -0700 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.5.6.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Junio & Martin, In the V3, i prepared a patch basing on Junio's suggestion. If this patch can pass review and be merged to upstream. What about the last two patches in the V2 (remove relative alternates only possible at current repos limitation), do you think it is safe to pick up these two patches? Hui Wang (1): sha1_file: normalize alt_odb path before comparing and storing sha1_file.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)