* [PATCH] pretty: add '*' modifier to add LF after non-empty
@ 2012-02-23 13:10 Luc Pionchon
2012-02-23 19:53 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luc Pionchon @ 2012-02-23 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: gitster, Luc Pionchon
Add the '*' modifier, similar to the '+' modifier,
to add a line-feed after a non-empty placeholder.
Allow to print a head-line which content can be empty.
For example for decorations:
$ git log --graph --pretty=format:"%C(green)%*d %C(reset)%s"
^^^
* (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master)
| Update draft release notes to 1.7.10
* Merge branch 'jc/maint-request-pull-for-tag'
|\
| * (origin/jc/maint-request-pull-for-tag)
| | request-pull: explicitly ask tags/$name to be pulled
* | Merge branch 'bl/gitweb-project-filter'
|\ \
| * | (origin/bl/gitweb-project-filter)
| | | gitweb: Make project search respect project_filter
Signed-off-by: Luc Pionchon <pionchon.luc@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/pretty-formats.txt | 4 ++++
pretty.c | 6 ++++++
t/t6006-rev-list-format.sh | 10 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Hi,
I now started to use git. When formatting my 'log' output, I have been looking for a modifier to add a line feed after a (potentially empty) placeholder. Git allows to add a line feed before, but not after a placeholder. This is a small patch that adds the feature. I hope it is useful to others.
diff --git a/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt b/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt
index 880b6f2..9114d49 100644
--- a/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt
+++ b/Documentation/pretty-formats.txt
@@ -159,6 +159,10 @@ If you add a `{plus}` (plus sign) after '%' of a placeholder, a line-feed
is inserted immediately before the expansion if and only if the
placeholder expands to a non-empty string.
+If you add a `*` (asterisk sign) after '%' of a placeholder, a line-feed
+is inserted immediately after the expansion if and only if the
+placeholder expands to a non-empty string.
+
If you add a `-` (minus sign) after '%' of a placeholder, line-feeds that
immediately precede the expansion are deleted if and only if the
placeholder expands to an empty string.
diff --git a/pretty.c b/pretty.c
index 8688b8f..5ebaf88 100644
--- a/pretty.c
+++ b/pretty.c
@@ -1132,6 +1132,7 @@ static size_t format_commit_item(struct strbuf *sb, const char *placeholder,
NO_MAGIC,
ADD_LF_BEFORE_NON_EMPTY,
DEL_LF_BEFORE_EMPTY,
+ ADD_LF_AFTER_NON_EMPTY,
ADD_SP_BEFORE_NON_EMPTY
} magic = NO_MAGIC;
@@ -1142,6 +1143,9 @@ static size_t format_commit_item(struct strbuf *sb, const char *placeholder,
case '+':
magic = ADD_LF_BEFORE_NON_EMPTY;
break;
+ case '*':
+ magic = ADD_LF_AFTER_NON_EMPTY;
+ break;
case ' ':
magic = ADD_SP_BEFORE_NON_EMPTY;
break;
@@ -1162,6 +1166,8 @@ static size_t format_commit_item(struct strbuf *sb, const char *placeholder,
} else if (orig_len != sb->len) {
if (magic == ADD_LF_BEFORE_NON_EMPTY)
strbuf_insert(sb, orig_len, "\n", 1);
+ else if (magic == ADD_LF_AFTER_NON_EMPTY)
+ strbuf_addstr(sb, "\n");
else if (magic == ADD_SP_BEFORE_NON_EMPTY)
strbuf_insert(sb, orig_len, " ", 1);
}
diff --git a/t/t6006-rev-list-format.sh b/t/t6006-rev-list-format.sh
index 4442790..c692061 100755
--- a/t/t6006-rev-list-format.sh
+++ b/t/t6006-rev-list-format.sh
@@ -208,6 +208,16 @@ test_expect_success 'add LF before non-empty (2)' '
grep "^$" actual
'
+test_expect_success 'add LF after non-empty (1) (empty)' '
+ git show -s --pretty=format:"%*d%s%nfoo%n" HEAD^^ >actual &&
+ test $(wc -l <actual) = 2
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'add LF after non-empty (2) (non empty)' '
+ git show -s --pretty=format:"%*d%s%nfoo%n" HEAD >actual &&
+ test $(wc -l <actual) = 3
+'
+
test_expect_success 'add SP before non-empty (1)' '
git show -s --pretty=format:"%s% bThanks" HEAD^^ >actual &&
test $(wc -w <actual) = 2
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pretty: add '*' modifier to add LF after non-empty
2012-02-23 13:10 [PATCH] pretty: add '*' modifier to add LF after non-empty Luc Pionchon
@ 2012-02-23 19:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-24 10:58 ` Luc Pionchon
2012-04-14 20:01 ` Felipe Contreras
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2012-02-23 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luc Pionchon; +Cc: git
Luc Pionchon <pionchon.luc@gmail.com> writes:
> Add the '*' modifier, similar to the '+' modifier,
> to add a line-feed after a non-empty placeholder.
Hrm, I thought I designed the plus and minus fairly carefully so that
nobody needs to add this later.
Wouldn't it be sufficient to write
Foo%n%-d
that says "We usually have LF after Foo, and write %d after that, but we
might not have anything interesting in %d at all, in which case we don't
add that %n"?
> +test_expect_success 'add LF after non-empty (1) (empty)' '
> + git show -s --pretty=format:"%*d%s%nfoo%n" HEAD^^ >actual &&
Shouldn't this be equivalent to "%n%-d%s%nfoo%n", which in turn is covered
by one of the previous tests (del LF before empty)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pretty: add '*' modifier to add LF after non-empty
2012-02-23 19:53 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2012-02-24 10:58 ` Luc Pionchon
2012-04-14 20:01 ` Felipe Contreras
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luc Pionchon @ 2012-02-24 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 21:53, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Luc Pionchon <pionchon.luc@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Add the '*' modifier, similar to the '+' modifier,
> > to add a line-feed after a non-empty placeholder.
>
> Hrm, I thought I designed the plus and minus fairly carefully so that
> nobody needs to add this later.
>
> Wouldn't it be sufficient to write
>
> Foo%n%-d
>
>
> that says "We usually have LF after Foo, and write %d after that, but we
> might not have anything interesting in %d at all, in which case we don't
> add that %n"?
What I want is a LF after the non empty, rather than before.
It seems to me that %n%-d is equivalent to %+d,
or did I miss something?
See the 3 examples below, with %n%-d, %+d and %*d
$ ./git log -5 --graph --pretty=format:"%C(yellow bold)%n%-d %C(reset)%s"
*
|\ (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) Sync with 1.7.9.2
| *
| | (v1.7.9.2, origin/maint) Git 1.7.9.2
| * completion: use tabs for indentation
| * completion: remove stale "to submit patches" documentation
* | git-p4: the option to specify 'host' is -H, not -h
$ ./git log -5 --graph --pretty=format:"%C(yellow bold)%+d %C(reset)%s"
*
|\ (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) Sync with 1.7.9.2
| *
| | (v1.7.9.2, origin/maint) Git 1.7.9.2
| * completion: use tabs for indentation
| * completion: remove stale "to submit patches" documentation
* | git-p4: the option to specify 'host' is -H, not -h
$ ./git log -5 --graph --pretty=format:"%C(yellow bold)%*d %C(reset)%s"
* (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master)
|\ Sync with 1.7.9.2
| * (v1.7.9.2, origin/maint)
| | Git 1.7.9.2
| * completion: use tabs for indentation
| * completion: remove stale "to submit patches" documentation
* | git-p4: the option to specify 'host' is -H, not -h
Also as a side note, I noticed that color is lost after new lines.
>
> > +test_expect_success 'add LF after non-empty (1) (empty)' '
> > + git show -s --pretty=format:"%*d%s%nfoo%n" HEAD^^ >actual &&
>
> Shouldn't this be equivalent to "%n%-d%s%nfoo%n", which in turn is covered
> by one of the previous tests (del LF before empty)?
I think the later is equivalent to %+d%s%nfoo%n, am I wrong?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pretty: add '*' modifier to add LF after non-empty
2012-02-23 19:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-24 10:58 ` Luc Pionchon
@ 2012-04-14 20:01 ` Felipe Contreras
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Contreras @ 2012-04-14 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Luc Pionchon, git
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Luc Pionchon <pionchon.luc@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Add the '*' modifier, similar to the '+' modifier,
>> to add a line-feed after a non-empty placeholder.
>
> Hrm, I thought I designed the plus and minus fairly carefully so that
> nobody needs to add this later.
>
> Wouldn't it be sufficient to write
>
> Foo%n%-d
>
> that says "We usually have LF after Foo, and write %d after that, but we
> might not have anything interesting in %d at all, in which case we don't
> add that %n"?
>
>> +test_expect_success 'add LF after non-empty (1) (empty)' '
>> + git show -s --pretty=format:"%*d%s%nfoo%n" HEAD^^ >actual &&
>
> Shouldn't this be equivalent to "%n%-d%s%nfoo%n", which in turn is covered
> by one of the previous tests (del LF before empty)?
Nope.
Try this:
--- a/t/t6006-rev-list-format.sh
+++ b/t/t6006-rev-list-format.sh
@@ -208,6 +208,25 @@ test_expect_success 'add LF before non-empty (2)' '
grep "^$" actual
'
+test_expect_success 'add LF after non-empty (1) (empty)' '
+ git show -s --pretty=format:"%n%-d%s%nfoo%n" HEAD^^ >actual &&
+ cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+ added foo
+ foo
+ EOF
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'add LF after non-empty (2) (non empty)' '
+ git show -s --pretty=format:"%n%-d%s%nfoo%n" HEAD >actual &&
+ cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+ (HEAD, master)
+ Test printing of complex bodies
+ foo
+ EOF
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
test_expect_success 'add SP before non-empty (1)' '
git show -s --pretty=format:"%s% bThanks" HEAD^^ >actual &&
test $(wc -w <actual) = 2
Luc's patch makes these tests work.
I don't know if there's any way to have a format string that works
with the current code, but your suggestion doesn't seem to do the
trick.
Cheers.
--
Felipe Contreras
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-14 20:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-23 13:10 [PATCH] pretty: add '*' modifier to add LF after non-empty Luc Pionchon
2012-02-23 19:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-24 10:58 ` Luc Pionchon
2012-04-14 20:01 ` Felipe Contreras
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).